Earlier this week, we wrote what was perhaps one of the most timely posts ever in the history of Political Calculations, as we discussed how we may have finally succeeded in compensating for the echo effect in our forecasting method for anticipating the future of the S&P 500:
Here's the result of our rebaselining the calculation to incorporate the historic stock data in our projections of today:
Suddenly, we find that stock prices would appear to be once again predictable, currently following the trajectories that are consistent with investors continuing to be focused on either 2014-Q3 or 2015-Q2 in setting current day stock prices - just as they were before we ran into the echo effect using our regular one-year ago base reference period!
But now, we appear to have reached a fork for that trajectory, where we'll soon determine which future investors are really focused upon.
That's become relevant again today because from all appearances, the S&P 500 followed Yogi Berra's advice about what to do when facing a fork in the road: it took it!
Or more accurately, after a few days of seeming to split their forward-looking focus between the futures defined by the expectations associated with 2014-Q3 and 2015-Q2, investors really focused upon 2015-Q2 in setting today's stock prices.
Meanwhile, the news reports of the day's trading activity would suggest that nobody else had any sort of handle on what was driving stock prices, so they were more or less randomly pointing in all directions:
Investors said an upbeat reading from the labor market sowed concerns about the Federal Reserve possibly raising rates quicker than many investors anticipate. Some pointed to disappointing earnings reports from U.S. companies Thursday, which disrupted what has been a strong season for corporate profits. Others pointed to Argentina's default on some bonds and fresh worries that the euro zone's central bank will need to provide more stimulus.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 317.06 points, or 1.9%, to 16563.30. The S&P 500 shed 39.40 points, or 2%, to 1930.67 and the Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 93.13 points, or 2.1%, to 4369.77.
"There are so many things that are coming to a head simultaneously," said Joe Spinelli, head of Americas single stock trading at Deutsche Bank. "Clients are wanting to get into a position to ride out any storm that might pop up."
In reality, investors were adapting their investment portfolio holdings to match the fundamental expectations that coincide with the specific point of time in the future that they've focused upon in making their investment decisions today. And on 31 July 2014, that meant a sudden decline in stock prices, as the S&P 500 suddenly caught up to the future investors had focused upon.
The only real randomness in how stock prices behaved was in the timing for when that shift in focus occurred. How much they would change was not so random considering how stock prices really work as a quantum phenomenon.
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations.com
Thanks in advance!
This site is primarily powered by:
CSS Validation
RSS Site Feed
JavaScript
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.
Other Cool Resources
Blog Roll
Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.
