Unexpectedly Intriguing!
August 1, 2016

With the one month anniversary of the stock market's reaction to the Brexit vote event, the fourth week of July 2016 provided the first test of the latest method we're testing out to account for the echo effect that our standard model experiences due to its use of historic stock prices. Here, because we use historic stock prices as the base reference points from which to project future stock prices, when those historic prices reflect abnormal levels of volatility, it can affect the accuracy of our standard model's projections of the future.

To see what we mean, the following chart shows what our standard model projected for the most likely trajectories for U.S. stock prices in Week 4 of of July 2016.

Alternative Futures - S&P 500 - 2016Q3 - Standard Model - Snapshot 2016-07-29

As you can see, the S&P 500 was following the trajectory associated with investors focusing the distant future quarter of 2017-Q2 in the period immediately preceding Week 4 of July 2016, and was more closely following that trajectory following the end of the one month echo of the Brexit noise event.

In between however, our standard model's projections mirrored the volatile trajectory that the S&P 500 followed during the Brexit noise event, which deviated sharply from the actual trajectory that the S&P 500 took during that portion of the week.

As part of our imaginatively named "Modified Model 01" (MM1), we substituted alternative trajectories for the S&P 500 that parallels the average trajectory that the S&P 500 has taken over the last 65 years. From first appearances, MM1 appears to have passed its first test, with its projections of stock prices during the week coming much closer to the actual recorded values.

Alternative Futures - S&P 500 - 2016Q3 - Modified Model 01 - Snapshot 2016-07-29

That's not saying very much. We could have even more easily just "connected the dots" for the projected values of the S&P 500 on each side of the echo for the one month anniversary of the Brexit noise event for each alternative trajectory with straight lines and have achieved just as good a result.

The bigger test will come later in the quarter, when we reach the one year anniversary of the volatility that accompanied China's market meltdown in mid-August. We have no idea how that's going to turn out.

Looking back at Week 4 of July 2016, here are the headlines that caught our attention during the week.

Monday, 25 July 2016
Tuesday, 26 July 2016
Wednesday, 27 July 2016
Thursday, 28 July 2016
Friday, 29 July 2016

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Stock Charts and News

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.