Unexpectedly Intriguing!
January 5, 2018

2017 marked something of a turnaround for the fate of dividends paid by publicly-traded companies throughout the year. What had been a multi-year declining trend for the U.S. stock market since mid-2014 appeared to bottom out between March and June 2017, before reversing into an improving trend throughout the rest of the year.

Number of Public U.S. Companies Increasing or Decreasing Dividends in Each Month from 
January 2004 through December 2017

Let's drill down into December 2017's numbers, before we comment on some unique developments in the last month of the year that was.

  • 4,506 publicly-traded U.S. firms issued some kind of declaration regarding their dividends in December 2017, the most on record for data that extends back to January 2004. That figure was up from 3,518 in November 2017, and also from the 4,252 that declared their dividends back in December 2016.
  • 144 U.S. companies announced that they would pay an extra, or special, dividend payment to their shareholders in December 2017, up from 109 a month earlier, but down from the 162 that did in December 2016. The greatest number of extra dividends on record was in December 2012, just ahead of the so-called "Fiscal Cliff" tax hike crisis, where 483 U.S. firms went out of their way to pay out a special dividend to their shareholders to minimize their taxes as part of what we call the "Great Dividend Raid".
  • December 2017 was a lackluster month for dividend increases being announced, with just 126 U.S. firms boosting their dividends. That figure was down from the 185 firms that hiked their dividends in November 2017, and up slightly from the 119 that raised their dividends in December 2016.
  • December 2017 also seemed to be a disappointing month for shareholders hoping to avoid cuts in their expected dividend payments, where 54 companies acted to cut their dividends. That was up from 22 in the previous month, but the apparent silver lining is that figure was down from the 59 firms that announced dividend cuts in December 2016.
  • Finally, 7 firms omitted paying dividends in December 2017, up by one from the 6 that omitted paying dividends in November 2017, and up sharply from the 2 firms that took that action in the previous year's month of December.

Those numbers would appear to present a mixed story for dividends in December 2017, but the biggest political event of 2017, which came in the third week of December 2017, is very likely responsible for that result, where the situation for dividend-paying companies is much stronger than these numbers would initially make it seem.

Here's why. The passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is particularly beneficial for investors in companies that directly pass through income from their business operations to their shareholders, such as Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), where if they act to delay taking those dividend payments until after the law goes into effect in 2018, means that they can significantly increase their after-tax returns.

The tax plan features a deduction for pass-through businesses—income derived from commercial activities that their owners or shareholders pay on their personal income taxes. That deduction includes the income that flows to REIT investors through dividends—mainly from rent or mortgage interest—but not the capital gains secured when properties are sold.

The plan allows investors to deduct 20% of the income, with the remainder of the income taxed at the filer’s marginal rate. It is available even if the taxpayer doesn’t itemize deductions.

Shareholders of REITs who now pay the top income-tax rate of 39.6% on dividends received would see that rate drop to 29.6%, according to Nareit, formerly the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.

“Clearly this is a deduction that will lower the overall tax rate for individuals who invest in REITs,” said Dianne Umberger, the REIT leader for Ernst & Young’s National Tax Department.

The new provision would keep REITs an attractive vehicle for real-estate investors, and could fuel additional demand for REIT shares. That’s because investors who earn rental income outside of REITs could be subject to taxes at the top rate of 37% under the new bill but just 29.6% through a REIT.

The distribution of capital gains from REITs will continue to be taxed at 20%, according to Nareit.

“There has never been a lower rate of tax for rent and mortgage interest received through REITs,” said David Miller, a partner in the tax department of Proskauer Rose LLP. “This is unprecedented.”

For the managers of REITs with the ability to easily change when they might pay out their scheduled dividends to maximize the benefits for their shareholding owners, the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provides a particularly strong incentive for them to:

  • Hold off on announcing any plans to increase their dividend payments until 2018.
  • Hold off on announcing any special or extra dividend payments until 2018.
  • Announce dividend cuts or omit paying them before the end of 2017, then turn around and pay them in 2018 when taxes will be lower.

We see all three of these actions that would boost the after-tax dividend payouts to investors taking place to some degree in the data for December 2017, where we're really looking forward to what happens next for dividends in 2018. The only previous period for which we have data that shows similar dynamics was in the period from December 2012 through March 2013, when the threat of a massive tax hike on dividends spurred the Great Dividend Raid of 2012, and where the subsequent fiscal cliff tax deal in January 2013 led to dividends being increased because they would be taxed more favorably than regular income, which was a factor influencing the decisions of highly influential investors who could choose how much to be paid in either salaries or dividends.

On a final note, the number of firms omitting or suspending their dividends in December 2017 also includes a number of California utilities, such as Edison International (NYSE: EIX) and Pacific Gas and Electric (NYSE: PCG), which face liability risks from the wildfires that burned large tracts of land in the state.

With luck, they'll rebound to where they can resume paying dividends to their shareholders by the end of 2018, but the costs and penalties they can expect to be dealt in California's hostile legal and regulatory environment before that might happen will likely be substantial.

Data Sources

Standard and Poor. S&P Market Attributes Web File. [Excel Spreadsheet]. Accessed 2 January 2018.

Seeking Alpha Market Currents. Filtered for Dividends. [Online Database]. Accessed 2 January 2018.

Wall Street Journal. Dividend Declarations. [Online Database]. Accessed 2 January 2018.


About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Stock Charts and News

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.