to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
The outlook for the S&P 500's dividends through 2026 has improved in the month since we last presented our previous snapshot of their future. For the most part, they have improved with the 2026-Q1 looking to show the biggest jump.
Before we go any farther, we're referring to future quarters as they apply to dividend futures contracts, not regular calendar quarters! For dividend futures contracts, 2026-Q1 begins on Saturday, 20 December 2025 and will end on the third Friday of March 2026.
Here is our summary of how the outlook for the S&P 500's dividends has changed in the past month for the final quarter of 2025 and the upcoming four quarters of 2026:
The following animated chart shows how expectations for the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share changed in the month from 14 November 2025 to 15 December 2025. If you're reading this article on a site that republishes our RSS news feed, you may need to click through to our site to see the animation.
This is our last update for 2025, our next snapshot will be taken in mid-January 2026. Because it will soon be very relevant, be sure to read the "More About Dividend Futures Data" section, which explains why the quarterly dividends Standard and Poor will report for the S&P 500 are different from dividend futures data. We anticipate S&P will report the index' quarterly dividends for the calendar quarter of 2025-Q4 early in 2026.
How changes in the outlook for dividends at specific points of time in the future contribute to changes in stock prices is described by this math.
For this series, we have been taking a snapshot of the CME Group's S&P 500 quarterly dividend futures data shortly after the second or third week of each month.
Dividend futures indicate the amount of dividends per share to be paid out over the period covered by each quarter's dividend futures contracts, which start on the day after the preceding quarter's dividend futures contracts expire and end on the third Friday of the month ending the indicated quarter. So for example, as determined by dividend futures contracts, the now "current" quarter of 2025-Q4 began on Saturday, 20 September 2025 and will end on this Friday, 19 December 2025. From the perspective of dividend futures, 2026-Q1 will become the current quarter on Saturday, 20 December 2025.
Because dividend futures are tied to options contracts that run on this schedule, that makes these figures different from the quarterly dividends per share figures that are reported by Standard and Poor. S&P reports the amount of dividends per share paid out during regular calendar quarters after the end of each quarter. This term mismatch accounts for the differences in dividends reported by both sources, with the biggest differences between the two typically seen in the first and fourth quarters of each year.
Image Credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it". And 'Dividends' written above it, which we added.
Labels: dividends, forecasting
Delayed trade data has started to flow out from the U.S. Census Bureau. More than a month behind schedule, the latest data on trade between the U.S. and China is for September 2025. As expected, the total value of goods exchanged between the two nations slipped for the second month, falling from $33.4 billion in the previous month to $31.8 billion.
That's a net figure. U.S. exports to China were up from August 2025's level, rising $108 million to $8.38 billion. That gain was offset by a much larger decline in the value of goods exported from China to the U.S. in September, which fell by $1.71 billion to $23.41 billion.
The trailing twelve month average, which smooths out annual seasonality in the trade data, declined to $40.0 billion in September 2025. This figure is $9.6 billion, or 19.6%, below our counterfactual projection of what the level of trade between the U.S. and China would have been during the month in the absence of the global tariff war, had trade between the nations continued growing at the rate it was between March 2024 and March 2025.
The following chart presents the monthly data for the combined value of goods exchanged between the U.S. and China along with its trailing twelve month average in the period from January 2017 through September 2025.
The U.S. and China struck a new truce in the tariff war on 1 November 2025. This new deal lowered tariffs considerably more than their earlier 28 June deal, but we won't see its effect in the data until November 2025's data becomes available early in 2026.
Because of that deal's timing, we anticipate another negative month or two for U.S.-China trade data when October 2025's data is finally reported. Though it has not yet been scheduled, we anticipate that data will become available in the first weeks of January 2026. It's possible it may be reported along with the data for November 2026 as the Census Bureau gets fully caught up.
Despite lacking the full detail of the U.S.' import/export data, we do know that China reported a more-than-$1 trillion surplus in its trade with the world in in year-to-date. This record level was achieved because of China's falling level of trade with the U.S. and because China's domestic economy has struggled to grow during 2025.
That's possible because the ongoing negative impact of the U.S.-China tariff war and China's lack of domestic demand has resulted in Chinese producers having more goods available to export elsewhere. Which they have, because Chinese producers are facing a cash crunch and need the money.
Their actions are becoming a flashpoint in the regions where China is shipping its excess production. In particular, the European Union is threatening to impose new retaliatory tariffs against China's exporters, on top of its recent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles that have been flooding into the EU.
China's economic situation has worsened enough that China's official government data can no longer conceal it. Here are headlines from 14 December 2025:
How the imbalances that resulted in these headlines get settled will be one of the bigger economic themes of 2026. Stay tuned!
U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services (FT900). U.S. Trade in Goods with China, Not Seasonally Adjusted, Nominal Figures, Total Census Basis. [Online database]. Accessed 19 November 2025.
Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon showing Chinese container ships labeled 'Made in China' being diverted with large arrows away from the United States and toward other regions such as Europe, Africa, and South America". Sadly, in the original image produced by this prompt, Copilot didn't produce anything that looked like the actual continent of South America, oddly choosing to instead rename sub-Saharan Africa as "South America". The image still sort-of worked for our editorial purposes after several minor fixes, but we miss South America and urge Copilot to both acknowledge its existence and give the continent its due.
Labels: trade
After the Fed acted to cut the Federal Funds Rate by a quarter point on Wednesday, 10 December 2025, the S&P 500 (Index: SPX) went on to strike a new record high of 6,901.00 on Thursday, 11 December 2025. But the index retreated the next day as new fears arose about the outlook for earnings of firms making big AI-technology investments. The S&P 500 ultimately ended down 0.6% from the previous week's close, settling at 6,827.41 by the close of trading on Friday, 12 December 2025.
After the Fed reduced the Federal Funds Rate by a quarter point to a target range of 3.50-3.75%, investors had no reason to continue focusing on the current quarter of 2025-Q4. The CME Group's FedWatch Tool outlook for 2026 indicates investors anticipate future quarter point rate cuts on 18 March (2026-Q1) and 29 July (2026-Q3), with no other rate cuts projected beyond that date.
While these changes suggest investors would shift their focus to either 2026-Q1 or 2026-Q3 as they set current day stock prices, the trajectory of the S&P 500 in the past week instead indicates they are focusing on the distant future quarter of 2026-Q2 in setting current day stock prices. The latest update of the alternative futures chart shows that shift with the trajectory of the S&P 500 pacing the dividend futures-based model's projections of what the level of the S&P 500 would be expected if investors are focusing on this future quarter.
Here are the market-moving headlines investors absorbed during the week that was.
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool projection of real GDP growth in the U.S. during the recently ended 2025-Q3 ticked up from +3.5% last week to +3.6%. The tool won't shift to forecast 2025-Q4's GDP until 23 December 2025, which coincides with when the BEA's official initial estimate of GDP for 2025-Q3 will be released.
With the approaching holidays, we're anticipating little new market-moving news coming out after this upcoming week. Monday, 22 December 2025 will mark the final edition of our S&P 500 chaos series for 2025, with the next edition not arriving until Monday, 5 January 2026 after we come back from our annual weeklong hiatus.
Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon of a Wall Street bull and bear sitting in front of a fireplace drinking hot cocoa to celebrate the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates". We then ran second prompt to "Draw a cartoon thought bubble showing a balloon being popped by a pin", the result of which we added to the originally generated cartoon to show what the Wall Street bear is happy about.
The Inventions in Everything team celebrates the spirit of innovation, even when they fail to live up to the promises their inventors laid out in their patent applications. Usually, the IIE team focuses on the stories of inventions that were novel enough to be awarded patents, but today's feature is a truly failed invention that never made it past the patent application stage.
U.S. Patent Application 2008/0299533 A1 was filed on 4 June 2007. The application describes inventor Frank C. Orsini's vision of a "Naughty or Nice Meter", which would let children discover exactly how they stand in the eyes of Santa Claus.
That's right, the Santa Claus. Who, as we all know, determines whether or not any of the items listed on a child's Christmas wish list will ever show up among any gifts they open. Provided they don't forget to leave some cookies and milk out to snack on when he might visit.
All children have to do is submit their honest self-assessment of how well they've performed on twelve behavioral metrics, scoring each on a scale of 0-to-5, with the Naughty or Nice Meter tallying their total score to determine whether they qualify as naughty, nice, or something in between. Because apparently, Santa Claus believes these kinds of metrics are extremely valuable for assessing child performance and has chosen helpers who all aspire to work in the human resources department of a large, impersonal corporation to help him compile the records he needs to quantify their moral development.
To be fair, it could be worse. If the alternative is Santa Claus operating the most sophisticated personal surveillance system ever devised to actively and continuously monitor every person on the planet to find out who's really naughty and who's really nice, we should all be grateful of Orsini's proposed innovation. Here's a figure from the patent application we've colorized to give a sense of how the behavioral self-assessment might be presented to the child resource who needs their naughtiness/niceness score quantified:
Here are Orsini's suggested twelve metrics on which the child resource's morality might be assessed:
The Naughty and Nice Meter allows the user to input the scores into a calculator, which determines the child resource's final ranking. Orsini proposes the following scale, which closely resembles the kind of grading system you might have encountered in elementary school:
In any case, we can see why Orsini's Naughty or Nice Meter never became a patented invention. For an invention submitted in the 2000s, there's nothing truly patent-worthy about its physical manifestation, while its functionality relies on the previously patented technology of a calculator. The only thing really unique about it is the algorithm Orsini concocted for determining a Naughty/Nice score, but alas, algorithms are not patentable.
We can go on with our analytical critique, but we're afraid we'll have to leave shortly to meet with IIE's human resources department auditor. It seems we need to complete some kind of evaluation that will determine what our next year bonuses will be before the upcoming holiday break.
Labels: technology
With the holiday season well underway, the following video from 2024 showing how a number of teens engaged in productive activities to help shoppers with gift wrapping services seems a good way to start our analysis of the teen employment situation.
Now, to the main story! The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics is slowly releasing the employment situation data that went unreported during the government shutdown fiasco. The data it reported for September 2025, which would have been reported at the beginning of October 2025 if not for a minority of Senators who obstructed a bill to fund the U.S. government's operations, shows that teen employment rebounded strongly in September 2025.
More remarkably, it was mostly led by younger teens, Age 16 and 17, whose seasonally adjusted numbers jumped from their August 2025 low. Older teens also had gains, which were solid, but paled in comparison to the numbers for younger teens.
The following chart captures the unexpected surge:
Unfortunately, there is a cloud on the horizon for teen employment. AI technology would appear set to decimate traditional teen employment opportunities in the years ahead:
For American teens, the summer job isn’t what it used to be. By 2030, it may barely exist at all. That’s the urgent finding from high school senior Karissa Tang, who spent the last 18 months researching how artificial intelligence is poised to reshape youth employment across the U.S.
Her work, conducted under the mentorship of UCLA Anderson’s Professor Geis, breaks the debate down to actual numbers that should alarm policymakers and parents alike. According to her analysis, AI will displace over 770,000 teen jobs by the end of the decade, gutting 27% of the most common positions teens hold today....
Tang’s paper, “The Impact of AI on American Teenage Employment by 2030”, tracks ten job categories that make up just over half of all teen employment. Her method connects market forecasts for specific automation and AI-powered tools, such as self-checkout systems or restaurant kiosks, to how many people each system replaces.
Tang identifies cashier jobs as especially vulnerable, with AI-programmed kiosks enabling a 54% decline.
But Tang sees where teens may have advantages over older members of the work force:
While it might be easy to assume AI hits all workers equally, Tang argues that’s a mistake. Teens often perform narrower tasks, have less experience, and earn lower wages, she explains. That makes them especially replaceable, or, in some cases, worth keeping precisely because they cost less.
“The ‘teen advantage’ is that they cost less,” Tang notes. “So for companies who are looking at AI to help cut costs, they may choose to lay off a higher proportion of older workers.”
It could be that younger teens may see disproportionate gains in the job market of the future.
Labels: jobs
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.