to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
We've had to shelve our popular "Dividends by the Numbers" series after the January 2026 edition. The series tracked the U.S. stock market's dividend metadata, which provided a simple, near real-time method of measuring the relative health of the U.S. economy.
Our analytical series was enabled by S&P Dow Jones Indices' Howard Silverblatt, who made the number and kinds of dividend actions announced for ordinary stocks traded in the U.S. stock market available each month. At this writing, it's possible S&P Dow Jones Indices will continue providing the stock market's dividend statistics on a quarterly basis, which had been the firm's practice, but they haven't yet indicated if they will.
We do however have other sources of dividend metadata to tap, which has at least two disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is we have to generate a methodology for identifying dividend changes that may not align with the practices that S&P Dow Jones Indices, or its predecessor firms, Standard & Poor and, if we go back to the beginning, Standard Statistics, followed in compiling the data.
Another disadvantage is the scope of the alternate sources we're utilizing, which we've encountered as we simply sought to compile a list of what publicly-traded companies in the U.S. stock market declared they would decrease their dividends in February 2026. None of the sources we used to generate the list we're presenting offered a complete listing of the common stocks that decreased their dividends.
Because there isn't a single source that provides all dividend decrease data for the U.S. stock market for February 2026, we have to proceed with the assumption that the data we have represents a sample of the total.
We've opted to focus on dividend decreases because that data can provide a raw indication of which companies and industries may be experiencing some kind of distress. That distress may be significant in the case of firms that normally pay fixed dividends, which requires action on the part of their boards of directors to change their dividend payouts. Or, in the case of firms that pay variable dividends, like oil and gas royalty trusts, the number of dividend decreases that are announced can simply be an indication of whether oil prices were down in the preceding month. For variable dividend payers in the oil & gas sector, we consider any number above ten in a single month as indicating the industry is experiencing potentially contractionary headwinds.
Having now set these basic guidelines for evaluating the data, the following chart visualizes what we found for our February 2026 sampling of 26 dividend decreases:
Here's the list of sampled dividend decreases for February 2026:
Starting with the oil & gas industry, we count eight royalty trusts that pay variable distributions announcing decreased dividend payments to their shareholders, which falls below the threshold of ten we've established for indicating anything other than month-to-month noise for the sector. This makes sense because oil prices had been falling in January 2026. It's won't be until March 2026 that the U.S. military action against Iran that has prompted an increase in oil prices will reverse that trend, which bodes well for these firms in April. At this writing, the expectations are this spike will be comparatively short lived, which is why the stock prices of major oil firms haven't boomed in response.
The most notable dividend decreases announced in February 2026 are the eight reductions among firms in the financial service sector. These are primarily made up of Business Development Companies, or BDCs, which provide loans to medium-to-small businesses. These firms have been hit by a combination of falling interest rates, which puts pressure on their profitability margins, and the disruption of businesses to which they lend from artificial intelligence technologies. In recent months, the outlook of firms in the Software as a Service (SAAS) sub-sector of the information technology sector have been absolutely hammered by the increasing capabilities of AI.
Closing out the list, four firms in the Materials industry (steel foundries, gold miners, and timber) announced dividend decreases. There two each in the chemical and real estate sectors, and one each in the banking and consumer goods industrial categories.
On the whole, with less than 10 firms in oil and gas sector and fewer than 50 overall, the total number of dividend decreases in our February 2026 sample falls below the threshold that signals recessionary conditions are present within the U.S. economy.
Image credit: Dividends definition. State Savings and Loan Association advertisement on Page 9 of Beatrice, Nebraska's Beatrice Daily Express, 12 December 1921. Chronicling America. [Online Database]. 12 December 1921. Public domain image.
Labels: dividends
The outlook for the S&P 500's dividends dimmed since previous snapshot of their future. For all five quarters in our forecast window, all showed decreases though of varying amounts.
Here is our summary of how the outlook for the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share has changed in the past month for the current quarter of 2026-Q1, the remaining three quarters of 2026, and the first quarter of 2027:
The following chart shows how expectations for the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share changed in the month from 13 February 2026 to 13 March 2026.
In the next edition of this series, we'll show 2026-Q1 as finalized and will add 2027-Q2 to the outlook. If the outlook for dividends continues to dim, we'll have to drag out our old thesaurus to find new expressions to describe the negative changes since we blew through all the ones we keep on ready standby for this edition.
For this series, we take a snapshot of the CME Group's S&P 500 quarterly dividend futures data shortly after the second or third week of each month.
Dividend futures indicate the amount of dividends per share to be paid out over the period covered by each quarter's dividend futures contracts, which start on the day after the preceding quarter's dividend futures contracts expire and end on the third Friday of the month ending the indicated quarter. For example, as determined by dividend futures contracts, the now "current" quarter of 2026-Q1 began on Saturday, 20 December 2025 and will end later this week, on Friday, 20 March 2026. The upcoming quarter of 2026-Q2 will become the current quarter on Saturday, 21 March 2026 and end on Friday, 19 June 2026.
Because dividend futures are tied to options contracts that run on this schedule, that makes these figures different from the quarterly dividends per share figures that are reported by Standard and Poor. S&P reports the amount of dividends per share paid out during regular calendar quarters after the end of each quarter. This term mismatch accounts for the differences in dividends reported by both sources, with the biggest differences between the two typically seen in the first and fourth quarters of each year.
How changes in the outlook for dividends at specific points of time in the future contribute to changes in current day stock prices is described by this math.
Image Credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it". And 'Dividends' written above it, which we added.
Labels: dividends, forecasting
The S&P 500 (Index: SPX) dropped another 1.6% during the second trading week of March 2026, closing at 6,632.19 on Friday, 13 March 2026. The index is five percent below its 27 January 2026 record high of 6,978.59.
Stock prices continued falling during this week as oil prices surged over $100 per barrel because of the Islamic Republic of Iran's efforts to close the Hormuz Strait in response to U.S. and Israeli military action against its government.
The surge in oil prices has raised the spectre of higher inflation, which in turn has made more Federal Reserve rate cuts, which had been widely expected, much less likely. The CME Group's FedWatch Tool projects the Fed will delay an expected quarter point reduction in the Federal Funds Rate steady until 16 September (2026-Q3), twelve weeks later than what was anticipated a week earlier. The tool does not anticipate any other interest rate changes in 2026.
The latest update of the alternative futures chart shows the trajectory of the S&P 500 following along near the bottom of the redzone forecast range during most of the week and dropping slightly below it on Thursday and Friday.
For analytical purposes, we can use the middle of the redzone forecast range to reasonably represent what path the S&P 500 would have taken if not for the impact of the Iran war. At this writing, the index would be around four percent higher than it is two weeks after the beginning of the geopolitical event.
Speaking of which, you can see some of the ebb and flow of it in the market-moving headlines of the week that was.
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool forecast of real GDP growth in 2026-Q1 jumped to +2.7%, rebounding from the +2.1% growth anticipated a week earlier.
Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon of a suit-wearing Wall Street bull and bear who react to a news ticker that says 'IRAN WAR' and 'OIL PRICE SPIKE' and 'RATE CUTS DELAYED' by screaming".
When the price of fuel soars, drivers who seek to avoid spending money on petroleum have two options. They can:
For many, driving less is an obvious solution, but one that isn't necessarily achievable. That's comes down to why people have cars in the first place. They need them to travel to and from work and also to and from where they buy the goods and services they need.
In today's world, whether they drive a gas-powered, battery-powered or hybrid vehicle, some non-zero percentage of the fuel or energy needed to enable their ride will be produced by fossil fuels. When the price of oil and other fossil fuels rise, the cost of essential commuting goes up as well. But you can limit your exposure to those higher costs by slowing down to drive your vehicle at speeds where it is more efficient.
That fact was established by a nearly three-decade old study by the U.S. Department of Energy that found that most gasoline-powered vehicles in the U.S. are operated at speeds at which they do achieve their peak level of fuel efficiency. At highway speeds, for instance, the forces of aerodynamic drag can substantially increase the amount of fuel an automobile engine has to burn in order to sustain a high velocity. A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation reveals that the amount of drag force that a car being driven at 75 miles per hour sees is some 33% higher than the same car being driven at 65 miles per hour would see.
Though today's roads have more electric and hybrid vehicles driving upon them, they are still affected by the same laws of aerodynamics. Like gas-powered vehicles, it takes less energy to sustain them moving at lower speeds, which means their batteries can hold their charges for longer.
But not too slow. Driving too slow also comes not just with a time penalty but also an increased penalty for fuel consumption. Most modern vehicles are designed to operate most efficiently at speeds ranging from 30 to 55 miles per hour. That's the sweet spot in which you can get the most distance driving out for your fuel consumption dollar.
We've tapped that old study to reverse-engineer the Fuel Economy vs Speed average vehicle profile developed by the U.S. Department of Energy and create the following tool, in which you can find out who much money you might save by going slower. If you're accessing this tool on a site that republishes our RSS news feed, please click through to our site to access a working version of the tool.
The cool thing about this tool is that you now have more weapons in your arsenal to help fend off the effects of higher gasoline prices! Armed with this information, you can now make whatever trade-offs you might need to your greatest advantage. For example, if getting the greatest possible savings is most important to you, you'll want to drive at speeds that produce the lowest equivalent cost per gallon of gas compared to your normal driving speeds. If you want to save gas money and time, you'll want to drive at speeds that give you the greatest equivalent "tax free" income compared to how you drive today.
Image credit: Lighted Automotive RPM, Temperature, Fuel, and Speedometer Gauges photo by Kevin kevin on Unsplash.
Labels: gas consumption, gas prices, personal finance, tool
The S&P 500 (Index: SPX) has reverted back to its mean.
We can say that because the S&P 500 has experienced a relatively stable period of order since the end of the fourth quarter of 2023. We know that's the case because the variation of stock prices with respect to the mean trend curve established from the relationship between stock prices and their trailing year dividends per share can be generally described by a normal distribution.
That in itself is remarkable because stock prices are very much not normal, even when they behave in an orderly manner. When you map their variation onto a chart with zones that align with significant reference points for a normal bell curve from statistics, you'll find both too many points within one standard deviation of the mean and too many points outside the zones where they would be expected to be found 99.8% of the time if that variation was really normally distributed.
But that doesn't mean we can't use the tools built for doing statistical analysis to track an index like the S&P 500 when such a period of order exists in the stock market. The following chart deploys those tools and finds that as of the close of trading on 11 March 2026, the level of the S&P 500 is just a short distance from its central mean trendline. Which is to say the level of the S&P 500 has finally returned to its established mean after having run above it since early September 2025.
This is an almost textbook example of what "reverting to the mean" really means where stock prices are concerned.
But in case you're wondering what it means when stock prices move outside the outer limits described by this kind of analysis, where order really does break down (as opposed to simply being the result of statistical outliers in a continuing trend like what happened back in April 2025), the ultimate textbook example involves the ultimate sell signal.
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.