Unexpectedly Intriguing!
06 April 2006

Here at Political Calculations, the month of April means two things:

  1. 1. U.S. Income Tax returns are due.
  2. 2. Fortune has released its annual ranking of the largest U.S. companies by revenue!

While we can't pretend to be too happy about the first item on the list, the release of the Fortune 500 rankings represents a treasure trove of accumulated data that let's us measure the economic performance of the publicly-traded titans of the U.S. economy.

Our first dip into Fortune's 2006 data pool has produced another annual ranking: the top 10 companies by number of employees! The static table below provides the indicated companies' rank within the Fortune 500, their industry, the number of their employees reported this year, the number of their employee recorded last year and the percentage change between the two numbers:

2006 Fortune 500 Top 10 Employers
Rank Company Industry 2006 Number of Employees 2005 Number of Employees Pct. Change
2 Wal-Mart Stores General Merchandisers 1,800,000 1,600,000 12.5
109 McDonald's Food Services 447,000 438,000 2.1
44 United Parcel Service Mail, Package & Freight Delivery 407,000 384,000 6.0
33 Sears Holdings General Merchandisers 355,000 380,000 -6.6
14 Home Depot Specialty Retailers 345,000 325,000 6.2
29 Target General Merchandisers 337,000 300,000 12.3
10 Intl. Business Machines Computers, Office Equipment 329,373 329,001 0.1
3 General Motors Motor Vehicles & Parts 327,000 324,000 0.9
7 General Electric Diversified Financials 316,000 307,000 2.9
8 Citigroup Commercial Banks 303,000 290,500 4.3

Note: The number of employees for Sears Holdings in 2005 was determined by adding the number of employees of the pre-merged Sears Roebuck and Kmart Holdings for that year.

The top ten employers of the Fortune 500 index collectively employed 4,966,373 people in 2006, a 6.2% increase from the 4,677,501 they employed in 2005. Of the 10 companies, only Sears Holdings reduced its headcount following the merger of Sears Roebuck and Kmart Holdings in 2005.

Overall, the 2006 Fortune 500 companies employed 24,746,142 people, with the top 10 companies by number of employees representing some 20.1% of that total. By itself, Wal-mart Stores accounts for 7.3% of the total employment of the Fortune 500!

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Indices, Futures, and Bonds

Closing values for previous trading day.

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.