to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
It's not often that we're wowed by a marketing pitch introducing new technology, but the problems solved by a device named Effie have us anxiously awaiting the arrival of U.K. inventors Rohan Kamdar and Trevor Kerth's creation to market. The following video explains why we're excited:
Effie wouldn't be the first device promising to solve the problem of making ironing a thing of the past - a similar-looking device named Swash was sold briefly by Whirlpool and Proctor and Gamble before it failed in the marketplace, for reasons that will become apparent when you consider the following video review:
And now you can see why we're excited by Effie's introduction. Not only does it look like it might be able to deliver on the promise that the Swash made, but couldn't keep, it also looks like a considerable improvement over it at the same time.
The downside? When the Effie hits the market later this year, Core77 indicates that it will retail for £699 in the U.K., which works out to be $994 in the U.S. at this writing (please click here for the latest equivalent price in U.S. dollars), more than double the $400 price tag of the failed Swash system.
Would it be worth that much to you to have a device that can automate the process of ironing of your clothes? Or perhaps the better question would be to what price point might a device like the Effie drop to make new sales to a wider consumer market once we get past the part of the innovation cycle where sales are be taken up solely by the innovator and early adopters?
Labels: technology
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.