Unexpectedly Intriguing!
08 July 2019

In what may now be the leading candidate for most misleading market headline of the year, Bloomberg's "Fed Debate Shifts From Large Cut to Whether to Cut at All", may have set a record in the financial press for being debunked in the article that followed it, falling apart within two paragraphs of actual reporting.

Here are the two paragraphs:

The Federal Reserve’s debate shifted from how much to cut interest rates later this month to whether to move at all after hiring in June trumped the expectations of economists.

Yields on two-year U.S. Treasuries jumped to 1.87% from 1.76% the day before, reflecting reduced odds of the Fed aggressively reducing borrowing costs in the near term. Fed funds futures, which had been indicating some possibility of a half-point rate cut in July before the Labor Department’s data, are now pricing a quarter-point reduction this month, and at one point on Friday even showed that outcome was less than 100% certain.

By "some possibility of a half-point rate cut", the article means the 68% odds that the CME Group's FedWatch Tool briefly indicated for that possibility just over three weeks ago (14 June 2019), which investors stopped considering to be a significant possibility just three trading days later (19 June 2019).

Meanwhile, by "less than 100% certain", we would have to go back in time just nearly as far to find the last time the CME Group's FedWatch Tool indicated anything less than a 100% probability of at least a quarter point rate cut for the Federal Funds Rate being announced after the Federal Open Market Committee's 31 July 2019 meeting. The odds of at least a 0.25% rate cut being announced at the conclusion of the Fed's upcoming July 2019 meeting have been holding steady at 100% since 19 June 2019.

Our best guess is that the reporting for the article was done 2-3 weeks ago, which Bloomberg's editors decided to drop with their misleading "Will they?/Won't they?" clickbait headline when the June 2019 jobs report was released on Friday, 5 July 2019. (We don't fault the author because the article shows signs of having come about through a "by committee" production process. We think it's an outlier for Bloomberg's otherwise very solid market reporting.)

The one thing that did change last Friday is that the stronger than expected jobs report prompted investors to lower the odds of the Fed cutting rates four times during the next nine months, where they now are expecting just three quarter point reductions, one in 2019-Q3, one in 2019-Q4, and one in 2020-Q1.

CME Group FedWatch Tool Probabilities of Federal Funds Rate Changing at Future FOMC Meeting Dates, Snapshot on 5 July 2019

For the S&P 500, investors sustained their focus on 2020-Q1 as their main point of interest for setting their future expectations, where the trajectory of the S&P 500 is tracking near the middle of the redzone forecast range we added to our spaghetti forecast chart for the index based on that assumption.

Alternative Futures - S&P 500 - 2019Q3 - Standard Model, with Redzone Forecast Between 21 June 2019 and 15 July 2019 Assuming Investor Focus on 2020-Q1 - Snapshot on 5 Jul 2019

Though it dipped a bit on Friday, 5 July 2019, the S&P 500 rose to set new record highs during the week, closing the week 1.6% higher than in the previous week.

And that's where things stand through the first trading week of July 2019. Here are some other headlines that do a better job describing the content of the articles that follow them from that holiday-shortened week.

Monday, 1 July 2019
Tuesday, 2 July 2019
Wednesday, 3 July 2019
Friday, 5 July 2019

Over at the Big Picture, Barry Ritholtz succinctly summarized 6 positives and 6 negatives in the major market and economy-related news he reviewed during the week that was.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Stock Charts and News

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.