to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
The Inventions in Everything team celebrates the spirit of innovation, even when they fail to live up to the promises their inventors laid out in their patent applications. Usually, the IIE team focuses on the stories of inventions that were novel enough to be awarded patents, but today's feature is a truly failed invention that never made it past the patent application stage.
U.S. Patent Application 2008/0299533 A1 was filed on 4 June 2007. The application describes inventor Frank C. Orsini's vision of a "Naughty or Nice Meter", which would let children discover exactly how they stand in the eyes of Santa Claus.
That's right, the Santa Claus. Who, as we all know, determines whether or not any of the items listed on a child's Christmas wish list will ever show up among any gifts they open. Provided they don't forget to leave some cookies and milk out to snack on when he might visit.
All children have to do is submit their honest self-assessment of how well they've performed on twelve behavioral metrics, scoring each on a scale of 0-to-5, with the Naughty or Nice Meter tallying their total score to determine whether they qualify as naughty, nice, or something in between. Because apparently, Santa Claus believes these kinds of metrics are extremely valuable for assessing child performance and has chosen helpers who all aspire to work in the human resources department of a large, impersonal corporation to help him compile the records he needs to quantify their moral development.
To be fair, it could be worse. If the alternative is Santa Claus operating the most sophisticated personal surveillance system ever devised to actively and continuously monitor every person on the planet to find out who's really naughty and who's really nice, we should all be grateful of Orsini's proposed innovation. Here's a figure from the patent application we've colorized to give a sense of how the behavioral self-assessment might be presented to the child resource who needs their naughtiness/niceness score quantified:
Here are Orsini's suggested twelve metrics on which the child resource's morality might be assessed:
The Naughty and Nice Meter allows the user to input the scores into a calculator, which determines the child resource's final ranking. Orsini proposes the following scale, which closely resembles the kind of grading system you might have encountered in elementary school:
In any case, we can see why Orsini's Naughty or Nice Meter never became a patented invention. For an invention submitted in the 2000s, there's nothing truly patent-worthy about its physical manifestation, while its functionality relies on the previously patented technology of a calculator. The only thing really unique about it is the algorithm Orsini concocted for determining a Naughty/Nice score, but alas, algorithms are not patentable.
We can go on with our analytical critique, but we're afraid we'll have to leave shortly to meet with IIE's human resources department auditor. It seems we need to complete some kind of evaluation that will determine what our next year bonuses will be before the upcoming holiday break.
Labels: technology
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.