to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
There's an entire cottage industry that has sprung up for Americans thinking about how long should they wait to start taking Social Security's retirement benefits.
If you only look at size of your monthly benefit, the numbers seem to suggest waiting for as long as possible to start taking the benefit is the right path forward. If you compare the amount of your benefit with what you would get if you waited until you reached what Social Security considers "normal retirement age", which has been set at Age 67 for those born in 1960 or later, your initial monthly benefit will be reduced by 8% per each year early. For example, if you start drawing Social Security as early as possible at Age 62, your benefit will be 40% less than what it would be if you had waited until Age 67 to start.
Similarly, if you hold out longer until Age 70, the longest you can hold out, your initial benefit will be 24% higher than what it would be if you had started taking benefits three years earlier.
But whether waiting like that actually makes sense depends on more than just how old you will be when you start taking Social Security benefits. If you have health problems that might keep you from living longer, for example, taking benefits earlier might make a lot more sense for your situation. If however you have a reasonable expectatation you'll live much longer, waiting to be older before tapping Social Security could be more beneficial for you.
The answer to the question of when to start taking benefits can also depend upon whether you're married or single. If you're married, the right age for you to start pulling Social Security's pension benefits may be different from the optimal age for your spouse to maximize your total household benefit. So what's the right thing to do?
That topic was recently covered on the RetirementNerds podcast, in which host Erik Soderborg ran through a number of examples with financial planner Zacc Call. The following hour-long video provides one of the better overviews we've seen of the factors that can complicate the major life event of deciding when to start taking Social Security retirement benefits:
We came across this video while researching an upcoming article that we're still developing behind the scenes, in which we'll feature another video by the pair discussing a different retirement-related topic.
Labels: ideas, personal finance
The total value of goods exchanged between the U.S. and China recorded by the U.S. Census Bureau increased for a third consecutive month in July 2026, the first such sustained rise since June-October 2024. Even so, the total level of trade between the two nations remains far below its pre-2025 tariff war levels.
Between June and October 2024, the combined value of U.S. imports from China and exports to China rose $3.2 billion to reach $55 billion. U.S.-China trade has risen $6.5 billion since April 2026 to total $36.8 billion in July. The value of trade between the U.S. and China during July 2026 is 33% less than it was in October 2024.
These figures are based on the Census Bureau's monthly trade data, which doesn't take any seasonality in the data into account. Applying a trailing twelve month average to the monthly data however confirms the large drop that has occurred in trade between China and the U.S., dropping from $48.4 billion in October 2024 to $31.4 billion in July 2026, a 35% decline.
The following chart reveals how the flow of trade between the U.S. and China has developed from January 2017 through July 2026.
The increase from April through July 2026 comes as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese Premier Xi Jinpeng are set to meet to discuss trade and other issues in the U.S. in September 2026. Curiously, the New York Times has chosen to focus on China's dominant trade position with the rest of the world ahead of that summit.
When President Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, meet this month to talk about a fragile trade truce, one issue is sure to dominate: China’s seemingly unstoppable export engine.
Chinese customs data released on Tuesday showed that in August, China sold $119.09 billion more in goods to the world than it bought — the fourth month in a row that the trade surplus topped $100 billion. Exports rose by 25 percent in U.S. dollar terms, while imports climbed 28 percent.
So far this year, the trade gap is already over $800 billion, and economists say it is on track to surpass last year’s $1.2 trillion, a milestone no other country has reached.
According to U.S. data, China's year-to-date trade gap with the U.S. is over $91.2 billion through July 2026, which as the data demonstrates, is much lower than it would have been without 2025's tariff war.
Why then has China's trade position strengthened so much everywhere else? China's domestic economy has struggled to grow during the past year, in part because of its tariff war with the U.S. With domestic demand not able to absorb their production surpluses, Chinese producers have redoubled their exporting efforts to virtually everywhere else in the world. The New York Times recently emphasized the role that China's economic weakness has played in contributing to China's global trade dominance:
The widening trade gap is also a symptom of lackluster demand at home. Consumer spending has been weak, while youth unemployment remains high. In August, China’s imports slowed, even as the country imported more high-tech goods like automatic data processing machines and semiconductors. Foreign car shipments have fallen around 20 percent so far this year as domestic brands dominate the market.
Looking forward, the article also references China's official trade data for August 2026, which is reported about a month before the U.S. data for the same month becomes available. That data indicates China's exports to the U.S. increased, which in turn, suggests the total value of U.S.-China trade increased for a fourth consecutive month.
Image credit: View of Port of Los Angeles with container ships by Downtowngal on Wikimedia Commons. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.
Labels: trade
The long-term downward trend for working teens continued in August 2026. The month saw the overall, seasonally adjusted number of teens Age 16-19 counted as having jobs come in at 5,373,000. While just 7,000 less than in July, that figure is 487,000 below the May 2024 peak.
Breaking the working teen demographic down into younger (Age 16-17) and older (Age 18-19) parts, the number of younger teens with jobs increased month-over-month to a seasonally adjusted 1,856,000, which is 505,000 below its peak from December 2022. Older teens with jobs however saw their seasonally adjusted number decline 95,000 from their level in July to 3,499,000, some 302,000 below their recent February 2025 peak.
Looking at the employed-to-population ratio of the working teen demographics, older teens still come out on top, with 41% of the Age 18-19 population employed, which is down from the December 2025 peak of 45.8%. Younger teens however have a bigger decline from their April 2022 employed-to-population percentage peak of 25.5%, dropping to 20.7% as of August 2026. This latter change is nearly equivalent to going from one in four teens Age 16-17 having jobs in April 2022 to just one in five as of August 2026.
The following pair of charts depicts the rise and fall of teen employment from January 2021 through August 2026.
Each of the data series shown in these charts are subjected to their own seasonal adjustment, which is why the employment numbers for the Age 16-17 portion of the teen population and the Age 18-19 portion won't necessarily add up to the figures indicated for the whole working Age 16-19 population.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor Force Statistics (Current Population Survey - CPS). [Online Database]. Accessed: 4 September 2026.
Image Credit: Waitress talking between groups of people sitting at tables in a restaurant photo by Negley Stockman on Unsplash.
Labels: demographics, jobs
The final week of summer saw the S&P 500 (Index: SPX) close out the week at 7,718.60, slightly up over the preceding week's close and one percent below its 13 August 2026 record high.
As expected, investors focused on the upcoming quarter of 2026-Q4 in setting stock prices. The future quarter has become the focus because of the Fed's ongoing "will they or won't they hike rates during the quarter" drama.
Speaking of which, the CME Group's FedWatch Tool projects a 59% probability the Fed will hike the Federal Funds Rate by a quarter percent on 16 September (2026-Q3), with a little under 41% chance of holding at its current target range of 3.50-3.75%. The big change from the previous week however is that the FedWatch Tool now projects the Fed will delay its next quarter point rate hike until 27 January (2027-Q1), although it still gives a 39% probability of an earlier rate hike on 8 December (2026-Q4).
The continuing uncertainty provides investors with an incentive to set their attention on 2026-Q4. The latest update of the alternative futures chart shows the S&P 500's trajectory remains consistent with the approximate level the dividend futures-based model would project for it provided investors focus their forward-looking attention upon 2026-Q4.
Here are the market moving headlines of the week that was:
The headlines out of Japan suggest the recent rising yields of U.S. Treasuries have a "made in Japan" element to them. This factor may be significant because they would have an effect on the U.S. stock market, with higher yields depressing stock prices because of the resulting higher cost of debt. The effect would be most pronounced on firms that are looking to utilize significant debt financing to support their growth.
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool anticipates +4.7% real GDP growth for the U.S. economy in 2026-Q3, ticking up from the +4.6% annualized growth it projected a week earlier.
Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon of a Wall Street bull and bear enjoying a Labor Day holiday barbecue as the bear says ‘I CAN'T BELIEVE SUMMER IS OVER ALREADY! WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FORWARD TO THE REST OF THE YEAR?’" We're not sure what the bull is thinking about with what they're barbecuing - perhaps they're a soy-based alternative to what they look like!
We first wrote about Hauser's Law in 2009. At the time, we described it as "one of the stranger phenomenons in economic data". The law itself was proposed by W. Kurt Hauser in 1993, who observed:
No matter what the tax rates have been, in postwar America tax revenues have remained at about 19.5% of GDP.
In 2009, we found total tax collections the U.S. government averaged 17.8% of GDP in the years from 1946 through 2008, with a standard deviation of 1.2% of GDP. Six years later, we revisited it once again and found that while the standard deviation was the same, average total tax collections from 1946 through 2018 was lowered to 16.8% of GDP because of 2013's comprehensive revision of GDP that significantly boosted historic GDP estimates after the basic GDP formula was redefined.
Seven years later, we're revisiting the historic data once again to see if it still holds. Spoiler alert: it does!
Here's a triple-set of charts to show off Hauser's Law in action!
Since we're now spanning 80 years worth of data, during which the U.S.' maximum income tax rate has ranged between 28% and 92% of income, we confirm once again that the U.S. government's total tax collections have averaged 16.8% with a standard deviation of 1.2% of GDP from 1946 through 2025. If you know your normal distribution bell curve from statistics, that means over 99% of the U.S. government's total tax collections from 1946 through 2026 would be expected to fall between 13.2% and 20.4% of GDP, which they have.
The pattern also holds true for U.S. personal income tax collections, although here, the average is 7.7% of GDP and the standard deviation is 0.8% of GDP.
What all these numbers mean is that the U.S. government's tax collections have been remarkably stable as a percent of GDP, or the national income, over the last eight decades, regardless of how the top income tax rate has been set. We think that represents a political equilibrium, especially as higher rates of tax collections have not been able to be sustained.
There are just four periods where tax collections rose more than one standard deviation above the mean level, none of which proved to be sustainable.
There's one final piece of the puzzle we haven't tackled, and that's why the U.S. national debt has grown so large even as federal tax collections have been so relatively stable. Here we find three factors that have contributed to its growth:
And that, in a nutshell, is why the U.S. government has gone from running mostly balanced budgets in the years before 1965 to running consistently in the red in the years since with few exceptions. The upward ratcheting of government spending in the years since 1965, and particularly since 2008 to levels far above what the U.S. government is capable of sustaining through its stable tax collections is why the national debt has grown to exceed $40 trillion.
Labels: data visualization, taxes
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.