to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Update: Wow! I never expected to get the pole position (the first post) in the Carnival of the Capitalists! Welcome readers, and if you're new to Political Calculations, please take some time to look around, as we're chock full of some neat stuff around here!
P.S.: Welcome Motley Fools!
Instapundit recently pointed to Brian Anderson's commentary in the Los Angeles Times Why the Liberals Can't Keep Air America From Spiraling In, in which he outlines the reasons he believes the "left-wing and proud of it" radio network will ultimately fail. The business junkie in me thought it might be fun to look at the strategic planning alternatives that the radio programming network's brass might now be seriously considering for its seemingly troubled enterprise.
For this kind of big-picture analysis, one of the most useful tools available to analysts is the business strategy matrix that was developed by General Electric, the Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey & Company. The matrix allows the analyst to lay out the selected organization's relative competitive strengths against the overall attractiveness of participating in a given market or industry. Where a company or organization falls within the matrix suggests certain strategic alternatives that may be appropriate for planning the enterprise's future. A similar matrix exists for non-profit entities.
We'll start this "bird's eye" analysis by looking at Air America's competitive strength. Anderson notes Air America's ratings in key markets:
And look at Air America's ratings: They're pitifully weak, even in places where you would think they'd be strong. WLIB, its flagship in New York City, has sunk to 24th in the metro area Arbitron ratings — worse than the all-Caribbean format it replaced, notes the Radio Blogger. In the liberal meccas of San Francisco and Los Angeles, Air America is doing lousier still.
Anderson's article incorrectly attributes Radio Blogger for the ratings comments. The comments are actually those of Brian Maloney, who published them on March 31, 2005 at his blog, Radio Equalizer. [Does the LA Times actually have four layers of fact checking? - ed. Mickey Kaus doesn't believe it either....]
Not wanting to take this editorial comment at face value, I looked into the Arbitron ratings for the Air America affiliates in the Top 20 national radio markets, which I've presented below:
Air America's Ratings in the 20 Largest Markets | |||
---|---|---|---|
Market | Station(s) | Rank | Share |
New York City | WLIB | 24(T) | 1.1 |
Los Angeles | KLTK | 39+ | - |
Chicago | WAIT1 | - | - |
San Francisco | KQKE | 25(T) | 1 |
Dallas - Fort Worth | KXEB | 36+ | - |
Philadelphia | WHAT | 25(T) | 0.6 |
Houston - Galveston | - | - | - |
Washington, DC | WWRC | 28+ | - |
Boston | WKOX, WXKS | 28(T) | 0.6 |
Detroit | WTDW | 28+ | - |
Atlanta | WWAA | 25+ | - |
Miami - Ft. Lauderdale | WINZ | 24 | 1.1 |
Seattle | KPTK | 23(T) | 1.2 |
Phoenix | KXXT | 22(T) | 1 |
Minneapolis - St. Paul | KTNF | 16+ | - |
San Diego | KLSD | 23(T) | 1.6 |
Nassau-Suffolk (NY) | WLIB | 26(T) | 1.1 |
St. Louis | - | - | - |
Baltimore | - | - | - |
Tampa | - | - | - |
1 Chicago affiliate WAIT is expected to begin broadcasting Air America programming in April, 2005. Reference: Wikipedia, and Radionewsweb.com.
As may be seen in the Arbitron ratings, Air America's affiliates rank either in or near the bottom of nearly every market in which they broadcast. In looking at the ratings in detail, there are a few markets where Air America has gained audience share over the past year, but more often than not, they have either lost significant share or have not improved. This drop in ratings may be partially attributable to the recent national election, which would have tended to attract more listeners before the election and lose them afterward, but the ratings at other stations broadcasting politically-oriented talk shows have not decreased as much as Air America's has in the same local markets.
Air America has also had difficulty in recent times in meeting its cash flow requirements, which impacted its ability to broadcast in both Los Angeles and Chicago, leading to both ownership and management shakeups in the middle of last year combined with changes in the network's business model. Air America has also recently replaced its CEO and president again within the last two months. When taken together with the network's low ratings in nearly all its markets, Air America's enterprise strength may be considered to be LOW.
The next question that must be answered is "how attractive is the radio broadcast market?" At present, the trend within the radio broadcast industry is one of consolidation. This trend is largely driven by relatively recent regulatory changes that have increased the number of stations that may be owned by a single entity within a given radio market. This trend toward increasing consolidation may be seen by looking at the ownership of stations within various major radio markets across the country, with many stations within many markets owned by large corporate entities such as Infinity, Clear Channel, etc.
As a general rule, the presence of consolidation within an industry indicates a high degree of maturity with little organic growth occurring. This state precludes a high level of Industry Attractiveness. This trend toward consolidation also indicates that outright withdrawals from the marketplace are not occurring, which would be the case if the Industry's Attractiveness was low. Consequently, the Industry Attractiveness factor is MEDIUM.
Air America's competitive position within the Business Strategy Matrix is indicated in the following diagram:
Air America falls into the cell indicating Medium Industry Attractiveness and Low Enterprise Strength. As such, the Business Strategy matrix indicates that the organization's leadership should pursue a strategy of withdrawing from the market in phases. According to the Boston Consulting Group's online strategy matrix, Air America's executives should:
It should be interesting to see what steps Air America's executives will pursue to deal with the radio network's business. As noted above, Air America is still adding stations to its network and has recently signed a new satellite broadcast deal, and has inked another deal to bring television talk show host Jerry Springer to its airwaves, which indicates that the third option is the preferred alternative at this time.
What is yet to be seen is whether or not Air America will be able to sustain the ongoing cost of its operations based solely upon the revenue generated by those operations. Currently, the network primarily obtains revenue from operations by selling its programming to distributors, such as Clear Channel, who then seek to recoup their expenses and make a profit by selling advertising slots for the broadcasts. Air America also sells some of its own advertising.
The question of whether or not Air America is viable as an ongoing business may then only be answered by looking at three additional questions:
As Air America does not make its financial statements public, the answers to these questions are only known to the network's major investors and its senior management. For the rest of us, the clock is ticking toward the ultimate answer.
Labels: business
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.