Political Calculations
February 14, 2007

Here's the situation: it's Valentine's Day, and you have two potential people with whom you might choose to go with out on a date on this romantic holiday. How on earth will you choose between them?

You might consider simply choosing the one you like best, but can you really trust your feelings? Fortunately, Geek Logik author Garth Sundem has struck again, finding ways to reduce life's quandaries down to friendly algebraic equations. Here's the back story from his new blog:

While I'm safely removed from the dating pool, Stephanie Street is not (is this perhaps a pseudonym?). She phoned in a Valentine's Day question to the PRI radio program Fair Game, and won the dubious honor of chatting with me and the host on air (tonight, online at www.morefairgame.org by 9:00pm) and thus having her pseudonym forever attached to this equation, heretofore known as The Manometer. Her dilemma was the choice between two proposed Valentine's Day dates—one eight years older, mature and stable and another two years younger, brash and exciting (does this sound like the plot of a Danielle Steel novel to anyone else?). The older gent was thinking basketball game while the younger had gone with the standby wine-and-dine.

Which to choose? Luckily the revolutionary Man-O-Meter makes Stephanie's decision easy (and maybe yours, too). Just plug in the numbers to rank each dude and go with the one that scores highest. And guys—it doesn't take a PhD in String Theory to switch the genders, just be careful with the age variables.

There's not much more to it than that! But before you scroll down to use the tool for doing the math, here's the Valentine's Date equation you'll be solving (and yes, we're a bit suspicious of how Garth names his variables - we think this one may be on par with the urban legend for explaining poor Latin American Chevrolet Nova sales....):

You read that right. The equation is set up to evaluate the "VD" score for each of your potential dates and according to Garth, you should "go out with the guy who scores most." Ahem. All we can say is that it must have made for an interesting radio show. In any case, here's the tool for solving this particular dilemma:

The Geek Logik Man-O-Meter
Input Data Values
How much would you enjoy the activity he proposed?
(Scale of 1-10 with 10 being "private jet to Milan")
How hot is the guy?
(Scale of 1-10 with 10 being "magma")
How fun is he?
(Scale of 1-10 with 10 being "Pee Wee's Big Adventure")
How stable is he?
(Scale of 1-10 with 10 being "the pyramids at Giza" and 1 being "The Leaning Tower of Pisa")
How compatible are you with him (education, life goals, etc.)?
(Scale 1-10 with 10 being "Bogey and Bacall")
What are your intentions?
(Scale 1-10 with 1 being "keep the Valentine's blues away" and 10 being "for better or worse")
Your age (years)
Guy's age (years)
How traditional are you?
(Scale 1-10 with 10 being "Little House on the Prairie" and 1 being "The Osbournes")


Your Potential Date's Score
Calculated Results Values
Valentine's Date Score (Higher is Better)

To be fair, Garth intended "VD" to stand for "Valentine's Date," but we couldn't keep a straight face after we saw the equation. And as dating selection criteria goes, it beats flipping a coin!

At least we now know that Garth's choice of variables wasn't accidental! It's just a shame he wasn't able to pull off his on-air prank!

Labels: ,



<< Home
Unexpectedly Intriguing!

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Posts

The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips

Mapping S&P 500 Performance, Since 1871

Should You Trade In Your Gas Guzzler?

What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?

Reckoning the Odds of Recession

Your 2009 Paycheck

Tipping Around the World

Revisiting the Lottery

Estimating Your Life Expectancy

Connecting the Dots for Personal Income Taxes

Quick Index

First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?

On the Moneyed Midways

A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools

Recession Probability Track

Recession Probability Track - 11 October 2005 through 9 October 2009

Political Calculations' Recession Probability Track shows the probability that the U.S. economy will be in recession 12 months from the indicated date (shown in red) while revealing the probability trend over the past four years.

Previously, the probability of recession peaked at 50% on 4 April 2007, which means that March-April 2008 was the most likely period in which the NBER would have found the U.S. to be in recession.

As it happens, they almost did. The NBER instead chose December 2007 as the beginning month of the most recent recession (we had found a 46% probability for a recession beginning in that month!)

On the Moneyed Midways

Political Calculations is also the online home of On the Moneyed Midways (aka OMM), a review of the best posts contributed to the week's best business and money-related blog carnivals. More than that, we also name one post in each edition as being The Best Post of the Week, Anywhere! and at the end of each year, we name The Best Post of the Year, Anywhere! as well as identifying the best blogs we found during the course of the year!

The link below will take you to the running index containing our most recent back issues (you can easily navigate the index to find older editions.)

OMM's Running Index for 2008

Recent Posts

Random Thoughts Tuesday

The Shrinking U.S. Stock Market

On the Moneyed Midways - February 9, 2007

The Worst Returns Ever for the S&P 500

Visualizing the Worst Case Real Returns for the S&...

What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?

A Clouded Eye on Socialized Health Care

On the Moneyed Midways - February 2, 2007

Probability of Recession: January 2007

The Dangers of Looking Backwards While Going Forwa...

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

TTLB Ecosystem

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

ZunZun - Exceptional regression analysis tool.
Wolfram Integrator - Solve integrals. Do calculus!
Create a Graph - Easy-to-use basic graph-making tool.
Many Eyes - Data visualization extraordinaire!


Archives
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member
Big Picture, The
Bloodhoundblog
Budgets Are Sexy
Cafe Hayek
Carpe Diem
Cheap, Healthy, Good
College Analysts
Copywriting Tips
Core77
Coyote Blog
Craig Harper
Darwin's Finance
Digerati Life, The
Disciplined Approach to Investing
Dividend Guy, The
Division of Labour
Doug Short
Dough Roller, The
Eclectecon
Econlog
Economics Roundtable
EconomicsUK
Entrepreneurial Mind
Environmental Economics
Escape from Cubicle Nation
Execupundit
Fat Pitch Financials
Fiscal Geek
Fortify Your Oasis
Get Rich Slowly
Gongol
Good Financial Cents
HR Bartender
Hot Air
i4cp Productivity
Ideologic LLC
Instapundit
Intangible Economy
I've Paid Twice for This Already
Joanne Jacobs
Kaus Files
Little Green Footballs
Mahalanobis
Making Ripples
Market Power
Mechonomics
Mighty Bargain Hunter
Monevator
Money Blue Book
My Dollar Plan
New Economist
Newmark's Door
Nina Simosko
Physorg
Private Sector Development
Radio Equalizer
Real Clear Politics
Richard Fernandez
Roger L. Simon
SCSU Scholars
Skeptical Optimist
Sound Politics
SOX First
Speculist, The
Sports Economist, The
squawkfox
The Truth Laid Bear
Three Star Leadership
Tim Worstall
Tough Money Love
Townhall
Trusted Advisor
voluntaryXchange
WILLisms
Winterspeak

Seeking Alpha Certified