to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
After the fireworks of the previous week, the second week of June 2016 was extremely quiet by comparison.
Let's quickly run through the headlines and our notes for the week that was.
Following the crumbling of the Fed's plans to hike short term U.S. interest rates again after last week's dismal jobs reports on Friday, 3 June 2016, at present, it appears that investors have sustained their attention upon the expectations associated with the distant future represented by 2017-Q1 in setting U.S. stock prices. Which is pretty much why stock prices didn't move around a whole bunch last week.
More than that, they're running a bit to the high side of the typical range we would expect stock prices to fall within for investors focused on 2017-Q1. Since Friday, 17 June 2016 marks the expiration of futures contracts for 2016-Q2, we could see a bit of volatility related to that event. Assuming that some news event doesn't cause investors to suddenly shift their focus to another point of time in the future, or the onset of a speculative noise event.
Early next week, we'll get our first indication of what the expectations are for dividends that will be paid in 2017-Q2, which we'll present with our tally of the week's market moving headlines for Week 4 of June 2016.
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.