Political Calculations
Unexpectedly Intriguing!
20 March 2026

The ranks of lower and middle class households in the United States is thinning. The reason why is remarkable: more households are earning higher incomes, allowing them to move up into the top ranks of the nation's income spectrum.

You don't have to take our word for it. We've organized the U.S. Census Bureau's inflation adjusted data for household income from 1967 through 2024 into three groups. The first group contains households with annual total money income of $49,999 or less, which represents lower income-earning households. The second group contains households earning between $50,000 and $149,999 to represent middle income-earning households. The third group contains all households earning $150,000 or more.

The following chart confirms the percentage share of lower and middle-class households in the U.S. is shrinking as the percentage of upper-class households increases.

U.S. households earning $150,000 or more in inflation-adjusted constant 2024 U.S. dollars have risen from 4.6% of all households to 26.1% from 1967 through 2024. Middle-ranked households earning between $50,000 and $149,999 has fallen from 52.4% to 43.8% of all U.S. households. The lowest-ranked households earning real incomes of $49,999 or less has plunged from accounting for 43.0% of all U.S. households to just 30.2%.

A similar pattern holds for U.S. families. See more commentary on this phenomenon here and here.

Reference

U.S. Census Bureau. Historical Income Tables: Households. Table H-17. Households by Total Money Income, Race, and Hispanic Origin of Householder. [Excel spreadsheet]. 25 August 2025.

Labels: ,

19 March 2026
A cartoon illustrating a Business Development Company that is internally managed versus a BDC that is externally managed. Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Designer.

When we reviewed the carnage among Business Development Companies, or BDCs, when recapping February 2026's dividend decreases, its concentration within this sub-sector of the financial services sector of the U.S. economy really stood out.

BDCs make their money by loaning money they either raise from investors or borrow themselves to small- and medium-sized enterprises that can't raise money by going public and selling stock and also financially distressed businesses. The business models of most established BDCs involve borrowing money, then loaning it back out at higher interest rates, where they pocket the difference.

That makes the profit margins of BDCs vulnerable to rate cuts. Because their loans are tied to the Federal Funds Rate, when the Fed cuts that rate, it negatively impacts BDC profits. In the last three years, BDCs have gone from a rising or high interest rate environment (March 2023 through August 2025), to a falling rate environment (September 2024 through December 2025).

The performance of the VanEck BDC Income Exchange Traded Fund (ETF: BIZD), which includes over 30 BDCs in its market-cap weighted index, gives a good sense of how BDCs performed in these different environments. The following chart shows BDCs rising or flat in the rising rate environment, but then either stalling or falling as the Fed shifted gears into its rate cutting mode.

Seeking Alpha: BIZD stock price, 13 March 2023 - 13 March 2026

But that's not the whole story. During the rate cutting period, which initiated the pressure on BDC profits, BDCs have had to cope with the DeepSeek AI shock, peaking just ahead of that event on 19 February 2025. Then they faced the Liberation Day global tariffs shock event of 2 April 2025, plunging with the rest of the market, before going on to recover. That lasted until August 2025, when the return of rate cuts initiated a new downtrend that was followed in January 2026 with a new AI shock event that undermined the business prospects of the Software-As-A-Service (SaaS) firms. Many of which were getting their funding to grow from BDCs.

With AI technologies seemingly set to destroy any potential profitability these firms had, many BDCs were suddenly faced with having to write down large portions of their portfolios. But, not all BDCs are in that boat.

When we looked at the stock performance of individual BDCs, we found a clear characteristic that divided them. That characteristic is their governance and what quickly became evident was that internally-managed BDCs were generally outperforming BDCs whose investments are managed by external parties.

To illustrate that difference, we randomly selected six externally-managed BDCs to compare their performance against an equal number of internally-managed BDCs over the last three years. Here is a list of the BDCs in our performance sample:

Externally Managed BDCs

  • Ares Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: ARCC)
  • Fidus Investment (NASDAQ: FDUS)
  • Kayne Anderson BDC (NYSE: KBDC)
  • Morgan Stanley Direct Lending (NYSE: MSDL)
  • Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NYSE: NCDL)
  • Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE: TSLX)

Internally Managed BDCs

  • Capital Southwest (NASDAQ: CSWC)
  • Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ: GLAD)
  • Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN)
  • Phenixfin (NASDAQ: PFX)
  • Rand Capital (NASDAQ: RAND)
  • Trinity Capital (NASDAQ: TRIN)

Let's get to the results. The following chart visualizes the relative performance of the stocks of the two kinds of BDCs:

Range of Investing Returns for Selected BDCs, External vs Internal Management, 13 March 2023 - 13 March 2026

We've shown the 3-year returns for the benchmarks of the S&P 500 (Index: SPX) at 72.01% and BIZD at -10.79% to show how they compare against the range of the two categories. The externally managed BDCs range from a high of +2.79% to a low of -29.22%, with four of the six BDCs having a negative return.

By contrast, the internally managed BDCs range from a high of +44.22% to a low of -16.96%, with two of the six BDCs having a negative return.

But it's not just recent market events driving that outcome. In the next two charts, we show how the sample of internally managed and externally managed BDCs compare with the performance of the S&P 500 over the last three years. The first chart tracks the internally managed BDCs:

Seeking Alpha: Performance of Selected Six Internally Managed BDCs over 3-Years

The next chart follows the externally managed BDCs over the same period.

Seeking Alpha: Performance of Selected Six Externally Managed BDCs over 3-Years

We find the internally-managed BDCs have sustained better performance than the externally-managed BDCs over all portions of this three year period, which can be seen in their relative performance being closer to that of the benchmark S&P 500 index. That better performance occurred both in a period in which rising interest rates provided BDCs with a tailwind and the current period in which falling interest rates are providing fierce headwinds against the BDCs.

When we started this exercise, we thought we'd mainly be discussing the role of how changing interest rates have affected the performance of the BDC sub-sector of the financial services industry, leading so many of these firms to cut their dividends in recent months. We didn't expect to run into a more interesting question: how much does management matter in a publicly traded company? In the case of BDCs, whether the people managing their lending business work directly for the firm or are employed outside of it would appear to have a significant impact affecting the returns of the shareholders who own the companies.

Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A cartoon illustrating a Business Development Company that is internally managed versus a BDC that is externally managed", the result of would appear to succinctly explain at least one reason why the outperformance of internally-managed BDCs over externally-managed ones exists!

Labels: , , ,

18 March 2026

We've had to shelve our popular "Dividends by the Numbers" series after the January 2026 edition. The series tracked the U.S. stock market's dividend metadata, which provided a simple, near real-time method of measuring the relative health of the U.S. economy.

Our analytical series was enabled by S&P Dow Jones Indices' Howard Silverblatt, who made the number and kinds of dividend actions announced for ordinary stocks traded in the U.S. stock market available each month. At this writing, it's possible S&P Dow Jones Indices will continue providing the stock market's dividend statistics on a quarterly basis, which had been the firm's practice, but they haven't yet indicated if they will.

We do however have other sources of dividend metadata to tap, which has at least two disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is we have to generate a methodology for identifying dividend changes that may not align with the practices that S&P Dow Jones Indices, or its predecessor firms, Standard & Poor and, if we go back to the beginning, Standard Statistics, followed in compiling the data.

Another disadvantage is the scope of the alternate sources we're utilizing, which we've encountered as we simply sought to compile a list of what publicly-traded companies in the U.S. stock market declared they would decrease their dividends in February 2026. None of the sources we used to generate the list we're presenting offered a complete listing of the common stocks that decreased their dividends.

Because there isn't a single source that provides all dividend decrease data for the U.S. stock market for February 2026, we have to proceed with the assumption that the data we have represents a sample of the total.

We've opted to focus on dividend decreases because that data can provide a raw indication of which companies and industries may be experiencing some kind of distress. That distress may be significant in the case of firms that normally pay fixed dividends, which requires action on the part of their boards of directors to change their dividend payouts. Or, in the case of firms that pay variable dividends, like oil and gas royalty trusts, the number of dividend decreases that are announced can simply be an indication of whether oil prices were down in the preceding month. For variable dividend payers in the oil & gas sector, we consider any number above ten in a single month as indicating the industry is experiencing potentially contractionary headwinds.

Having now set these basic guidelines for evaluating the data, the following chart visualizes what we found for our February 2026 sampling of 26 dividend decreases:

Sampled Dividend Decreases in U.S. by Industrial Sector, February 2026

Here's the list of sampled dividend decreases for February 2026:

Starting with the oil & gas industry, we count eight royalty trusts that pay variable distributions announcing decreased dividend payments to their shareholders, which falls below the threshold of ten we've established for indicating anything other than month-to-month noise for the sector. This makes sense because oil prices had been falling in January 2026. It's won't be until March 2026 that the U.S. military action against Iran that has prompted an increase in oil prices will reverse that trend, which bodes well for these firms in April. At this writing, the expectations are this spike will be comparatively short lived, which is why the stock prices of major oil firms haven't boomed in response.

The most notable dividend decreases announced in February 2026 are the eight reductions among firms in the financial service sector. These are primarily made up of Business Development Companies, or BDCs, which provide loans to medium-to-small businesses. These firms have been hit by a combination of falling interest rates, which puts pressure on their profitability margins, and the disruption of businesses to which they lend from artificial intelligence technologies. In recent months, the outlook of firms in the Software as a Service (SAAS) sub-sector of the information technology sector have been absolutely hammered by the increasing capabilities of AI.

Closing out the list, four firms in the Materials industry (steel foundries, gold miners, and timber) announced dividend decreases. There two each in the chemical and real estate sectors, and one each in the banking and consumer goods industrial categories.

On the whole, with less than 10 firms in oil and gas sector and fewer than 50 overall, the total number of dividend decreases in our February 2026 sample falls below the threshold that signals recessionary conditions are present within the U.S. economy.

Image credit: Dividends definition. State Savings and Loan Association advertisement on Page 9 of Beatrice, Nebraska's Beatrice Daily Express, 12 December 1921. Chronicling America. [Online Database]. 12 December 1921. Public domain image.

Labels:

17 March 2026
A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it (and 'Dividends' above it) - Image generated by Microsoft Copilot Designer.

The outlook for the S&P 500's dividends dimmed since previous snapshot of their future. For all five quarters in our forecast window, all showed decreases though of varying amounts.

Here is our summary of how the outlook for the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share has changed in the past month for the current quarter of 2026-Q1, the remaining three quarters of 2026, and the first quarter of 2027:

  • 2026-Q1: Decrease of $0.25, falling to $21.46 per share
  • 2026-Q2: Decrease of $0.08, dipping to $19.62 per share
  • 2026-Q3: Decrease of $0.05, ticking down to $20.28 per share
  • 2026-Q4: Decrease of $0.30, dropping to $20.12 per share
  • 2027-Q1: Decrease of $0.40, declining to $21.20 per share

The following chart shows how expectations for the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share changed in the month from 13 February 2026 to 13 March 2026.

Monthly Snapshot of the Past and Expected Future of S&P 500 Quarterly Dividends per Share, 2024-Q1 through 2027-Q1, Snapshot on 13 March 2026

In the next edition of this series, we'll show 2026-Q1 as finalized and will add 2027-Q2 to the outlook. If the outlook for dividends continues to dim, we'll have to drag out our old thesaurus to find new expressions to describe the negative changes since we blew through all the ones we keep on ready standby for this edition.

More About Dividend Futures Data

For this series, we take a snapshot of the CME Group's S&P 500 quarterly dividend futures data shortly after the second or third week of each month.

Dividend futures indicate the amount of dividends per share to be paid out over the period covered by each quarter's dividend futures contracts, which start on the day after the preceding quarter's dividend futures contracts expire and end on the third Friday of the month ending the indicated quarter. For example, as determined by dividend futures contracts, the now "current" quarter of 2026-Q1 began on Saturday, 20 December 2025 and will end later this week, on Friday, 20 March 2026. The upcoming quarter of 2026-Q2 will become the current quarter on Saturday, 21 March 2026 and end on Friday, 19 June 2026.

Because dividend futures are tied to options contracts that run on this schedule, that makes these figures different from the quarterly dividends per share figures that are reported by Standard and Poor. S&P reports the amount of dividends per share paid out during regular calendar quarters after the end of each quarter. This term mismatch accounts for the differences in dividends reported by both sources, with the biggest differences between the two typically seen in the first and fourth quarters of each year.

How changes in the outlook for dividends at specific points of time in the future contribute to changes in current day stock prices is described by this math.

Image Credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it". And 'Dividends' written above it, which we added.

Labels: ,

16 March 2026
An editorial cartoon of a suit-wearing Wall Street bull and bear who react to a news ticker that says 'IRAN WAR' and 'OIL PRICE SPIKE' and 'RATE CUTS DELAYED' by screaming. Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Designer.

The S&P 500 (Index: SPX) dropped another 1.6% during the second trading week of March 2026, closing at 6,632.19 on Friday, 13 March 2026. The index is five percent below its 27 January 2026 record high of 6,978.59.

Stock prices continued falling during this week as oil prices surged over $100 per barrel because of the Islamic Republic of Iran's efforts to close the Hormuz Strait in response to U.S. and Israeli military action against its government.

The surge in oil prices has raised the spectre of higher inflation, which in turn has made more Federal Reserve rate cuts, which had been widely expected, much less likely. The CME Group's FedWatch Tool projects the Fed will delay an expected quarter point reduction in the Federal Funds Rate steady until 16 September (2026-Q3), twelve weeks later than what was anticipated a week earlier. The tool does not anticipate any other interest rate changes in 2026.

The latest update of the alternative futures chart shows the trajectory of the S&P 500 following along near the bottom of the redzone forecast range during most of the week and dropping slightly below it on Thursday and Friday.

Alternative Futures - S&P 500 - 2026Q1 - Standard Model (m=-2.0 from 28 Apr 2025) - Snapshot on 13 Mar 2026

For analytical purposes, we can use the middle of the redzone forecast range to reasonably represent what path the S&P 500 would have taken if not for the impact of the Iran war. At this writing, the index would be around four percent higher than it is two weeks after the beginning of the geopolitical event.

Speaking of which, you can see some of the ebb and flow of it in the market-moving headlines of the week that was.

Monday, 9 March 2026
Tuesday, 10 March 2026
Wednesday, 11 March 2026
Thursday, 12 March 2026
Friday, 13 March 2026

The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool forecast of real GDP growth in 2026-Q1 jumped to +2.7%, rebounding from the +2.1% growth anticipated a week earlier.

Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon of a suit-wearing Wall Street bull and bear who react to a news ticker that says 'IRAN WAR' and 'OIL PRICE SPIKE' and 'RATE CUTS DELAYED' by screaming".

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Indices, Futures, and Bonds

Closing values for previous trading day.

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Archives