to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Five years ago, the Mars Perseverance Rover landed on the surface of Mars. Unlike previous probes and rovers sent to the surface of the Red Planet, Perseverance had a unique potential. The rover was equipped with drilling tools to obtain rock samples from where it traveled within the Jezero Crater and stainless steel tubes in which to store them for transport back to Earth.
The following video depicts the rover's arrival to the surface of Mars on 18 February 2021:
It's the storage of the rock samples that makes the Perseverance rover's mission so unique, because it marks the first time true economic activity has taken place on Mars. The robot rover extracted raw materials, packaged them, then placed them into inventory for the purpose of facilitating their export to Earth. This aspect of the rover's interplanetary trade mission represents the birth of the Martian economy.
As of 18 February 2026, the Perseverance rover has collected 28 rock samples, all stored in their packaging for transportation back to Earth. While most of those samples are still onboard the rover, ten of the samples have been deposited to the 'Three Forks' Sample Depot, where a future mission to Mars would be sent to collect and transport them to Earth.
Except that's not going to happen anytime soon. The original planners behind the Mars Sample Return mission left a pretty big, undefined hole in how that would realistically happen. Their basic concept was essentially a version of South Park's Underwear Gnomes' business plan:
NASA was very unhappy with the rough concept that had been originally developed for "Phase 2" and directed other engineers to develop more effective and less costly replacement plans to send new landers to Mars' surface, collect the rock samples from their depots where they are being held as inventory, and transport them to Earth.
Here is an animation featuring RocketLab's Mars sample return concept, which gives an idea of the complexity that's involved in a "Phase 2" for a sample return mission:
After more than a year of studies for the mission with little prospect of affordably achieving its goal, the U.S. Congress pulled the plug on the sample return mission as it had been defined on 6 January 2026 by declining to fund it. The appropriations bill funding NASA and cutting off the Mars Sample Return mission ultimately passed with a bipartisan majority of the U.S. Congress on 16 January 2026.
The Mars Perseverance Rover will continue to collect and store additional rock samples as its mission will continue, but exports from Mars will be on hold until the right combination of an achievable return mission at an affordable cost has been realized.
The following chart presents our latest estimates of Mars' GDP by Martian year and quarter:
Mars GDP has been in recession since the first quarter of Martian Year 38 (MY38-Q1), with no new rock samples collected or placed into inventory for export on Mars since March 2025. We anticipate that lack of economic activity will continue through the current Martian quarter (MY38-Q3), which will end on 24 April 2026.
Labels: ideas
Despite ongoing carnage affecting companies with exposure to AI technology development costs, the S&P 500 (Index: SPX) managed to eke out a small gain in the trading week ending on Friday, 13 February 2026. The index closed out the week at 6,836.17, down 96.13 points or 1.39% from the preceding week.
But the market wasn't down evenly among all stocks. Stocks for firms either making big investments in building out their AI-technology infrastructure saw big declines, joined by firms either financing them or at risk of having their businesses disrupted by the implementation of AI technologies.
Meanwhile, firms without that kind of exposure gained, as investors rotated their holdings into small cap and value stocks. If it weren't for that rotation, the index would have fallen further.
Together, these factors put the trajectory of the S&P 500 at the lower end of the range it would be expected to be for investors focusing on the upcoming future quarter of 2026-Q2. The latest update of the alternative futures chart shows the effect of investors moving away from the big cap tech stocks that have dominated the S&P 500 in the last few years.
The market moving headlines capture some of the rolling whackage, to coin a phrase, afflicting the stocks of companies with high AI exposure risks.
The CME Group's FedWatch Tool continued projecting the Fed will keep holding the Federal Funds Rate steady until 17 June (2026-Q2) when it gives an 87% probability of a quarter point rate cut. The tool also continues to anticipate the next quarter point reduction will take place on 16 September (2026-Q3). While these expectations have been stable over the past several weeks, what's new this week is that there is now a greater than even probability of a third rate cut in the offing, coming on 9 December (2026-Q4), thanks to the lower-than-expected inflation reported for January 2026.
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow toolestimates real GDP growth in the U.S. during 2025-Q4 declined to $3.7% from the +4.2% growth expected in the prior week.
Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon of a Wall Street bull and bear, both wearing suits, watching a roulette wheel come to a stop with the ball falling in a slot labeled 'VALUE STOCKS' as the bear says 'It wasn't going to keep landing on AI'".
Shiraz Robinson is a grad student in data science at the University of Virginia, who came to our attention shortly after the Christmas holiday for his Merry Christmans equations. Unfortunately, that was too late to feature his tradition of blending math formulas and holiday celebrations together, at least for that holiday, but he's back in time for Valentine's Day with another holiday-appropriate math formula!
Here's the equation, suitable for sharing with that special someone who appreciates math as much as you do! And before you ask, yes, it's safe for work....
x² + [y - (x²)¹/³]² = 1
While the mathematically inclined will immediately interpret this equation of love, others may need to plot it on a graph to truly appreciate its romantic message. We recommend checking out this GeoGebra version because you can play with the parameters d'amour.
Labels: math
The employment situation for U.S. teens was little changed in January 2026.
Overall, the seasonally-adjusted employment of Americans Age 16-19 came in at 5,448,000, which is 38,000 lower than the previous month's figure. The employed-to-population ratio for this demographic correspondingly dipped from 30.8% to 30.6% in January 2026.
Dividing the employment data up between younger teens (Age 16-17) and older teens (Age 18-19), reveals a mixed outcome. Younger teens saw their numbers among the employed increase by 35,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1,973,000, representing 20.9% of the Age 16-17 population. Older teens meanwhile saw their employment numbers drop by 69,000 to 3,478,000 in January 2026, falling from 42.9% to 41.6% of the nation's population of 18 and 19 year-olds.
The following pair of charts presents the latest data for teen employment in the U.S., covering the period from January 2021 through January 2026.
For the entire Age 16 and older population, the number of people counted as being employed rose from a seasonally adjusted 163,992,000 in December 2025 to 164,520,000 in January 2026. Working teens make up about 3.3% of the total number of employed people in the United States.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor Force Statistics (Current Population Survey - CPS). [Online Database]. Accessed: 11 February 2026.
Image credit: Wanted ad on OpenClipArt. Public domain image.
Labels: jobs
Estimating median household income in the U.S. is normally a pretty boring affair. Since July 2025 however, we've seen a significant divergence in the available monthly estimates, which suggests something not-so-boring is taking place in that data.
One source of estimates is provided by Motio Research as part of the analytical firm's Household Income Series. Motio Research's estimates are developed from income data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau for its monthly Current Population Survey.
Political Calculations generates the other series of timely median household income estimates on a monthly basis. Our estimates are produced using aggregate wage and salary income data published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and population estimates reported by the Census Bureau each month, which complements the survey-based estimates produced by Motio Research.
Normally, these two sets of estimates come in pretty close to each other, but that changed last year. Starting in July 2025, Motio Research's survey-based estimates notably spiked up above our estimates. What's more, they have maintained that difference through the end of 2025, even as our estimates have plodded along on a much more steady trajectory. This divergence suggests some factor is greatly affecting the survey-based income data, without affecting aggregate earned income data much at all.
There aren't many factors that can have that kind of effect. One that might however points to the Trump administration's efforts to deport the citizens of foreign countries who have been living and working in the United States without fully complying with U.S. laws throughout 2025.
One of the first things the administration did after President Trump was sworn into office on 20 January 2025 was to establish greater control over U.S. borders. That effort has greatly reduced the number of attempted unlawful border crossings. In the months that followed, the Trump administration expanded its efforts to get foreign nationals who unlawfully entered the U.S. or who have outstayed their visas prior to January 2025 to leave.
The administration claims it has successfully removed "nearly three million" such individuals. Over 625,000 of that claimed number is through the Department of Homeland Security's highly visible deportation efforts, while most of the rest has been through "self-deportation", which the Trump administration incentivized with an offer of free travel and a $1,000 cash bonus for foreign nationals to leave if they take the option. At the end of 2025, the administration even temporarily boosted the cash incentive to $3,000 to encourage more self-deportation before the end of the year.
We think these initiatives are affecting the survey-based income data. Assuming that most of those who are being deported or are choosing to self-deport are very low income-earners, their departure from the U.S. is very likely contributing to the apparent boost in median household income captured by Motio Research's analysis. If the incomes of people at the lowest end of the income spectrum are no longer being captured in the survey because they have left the U.S., the median will skew higher in favor of the higher incomes earned by those who are still living and working in the U.S.
At the same time, there would be a small, downward effect on aggregate earned income resulting from the departure of those who had been earning very low incomes. Which is what we see in the data. The aggregate income data shows a slightly slower rate of growth during 2025 than in 2024, which would be consistent with that dynamic.
The following chart shows how Motio Research's and Political Calculations' median household income estimates compare over the four full years from December 2021 through December 2025.
The data suggests the combination of incentives introduced in May 2025 with increased resources for enforcement that were passed by the U.S. Congress in early July 2025 could explain why the two median household income series diverged from July 2025 onward with the patterns we've described.
But would that really affect the survey-based median household income estimates? The answer is yes, given the math behind how medians are calculated as this following video lesson from the Khan Academy demonstrates using a simple example involving golf scores:
Of the two DHS initiatives, the DHS' incentive program for foreign nationals to voluntarily self-deport to receive free travel and a cash reward has been more successful in achieving its objectives. On 21 January 2026, the Trump administration boosted its cash incentive to $2,600 to encourage more such departures.
The standard disclaimer for this kind of analysis is that correlation isn't causation, which is to say there may be factors beyond these contributing to what we observe in the data. Whatever those additional factors might be, they would not appear to be evident in the years preceding these initiatives, which means they would have to have become significant at the same time as the DHS' initiatives. If the hypothesis the DHS' initiatives are behind it doesn't hold, what other factors would be capable of producing the observations we have for the divergence of median household income estimates in 2025?
Image credit: Department of Homeland Security. "Limited Time Offer". Public domain image.
Labels: median household income
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.