Unexpectedly Intriguing!
June 1, 2012

Trust. How can Wall Street firms regain the trust they lost from the long list of scandals that have arisen in recent years without any effective response from President Obama's Justice Department? Better yet, how can the U.S. government regain the trust it has lost as a consequence of its unwillingness to pursue clear indications of fraud where high ranking politicos with close connections to the government that is supposed to be on the investors' side in such cases might be involved?

In the wake of scandals like MF Global, where literally millions of dollars in the company's investors' accounts were drained without the consent of the account holders at the discretion of prominent Democratic party fundraiser and former governor of New Jersey John Corzine, the lack of an effective response to date from President Obama's Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation, or other federal law enforcement agency to the known facts of the scandal has done little to restore the trust of investors.

Worse, it seems like the wrongdoers are being given a free pass - a get out of jail free card - provided they have certain political connections. Under those kind of conditions, there's no way that anyone can reasonably trust the system in which Wall Street is trying to work today.

That has consequences, as the real needs of millions of people cannot be met efficiently if that system cannot be trusted, as potential investors either hold back or have to devote significant efforts to scrutinizing the firms with whom they do business to ensure the integrity of their investments are not at risk of being lost to fraud or other bad behavior. Markets, whether on Wall Street or Main Street, need trust to work, and a high level of trust among nearly all participants to really reach their full potential.

So what if, instead of relying upon the whims of a government that appears to take political affiliations into account in determining whether or not it might pursue criminal prosecutions, we used a market mechanism instead to protect investors from fraud? Chris Whalen recently discussed an old idea that we find especially intriguing:

Equity receivers have been around for a long time and have been very effective at combating fraud in their limited applications in recent history. We believe that taking steps now to make their role and visibility more prominent will go a very long way toward rebuilding the trust that Wall Street needs to reach its potential.

The alternative would be to continue weighting down the markets with more and more regulations that keep it far away from being able to achieve its potential, but somehow, never seem to affect the money-making schemes or personal pocketbooks of the crooked and politically-connected.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Stock Charts and News

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.