Unexpectedly Intriguing!
December 9, 2013

The S&P 500 continued to behave predictably through the week ending 6 December 2013, at least if our "echo-filtered" analytical technique is any indication.

Change in Growth Rates of Expected Future Trailing Year Dividends per Share with Daily and 20-Day Moving Average of S&P 500 Stock Prices, through 2013-12-06, with Echo Adjustment Since 21 November 2013

Going into the week, we had anticipated that the value of the S&P 500 would fall in the near-term, which held through Thursday, 5 November 2013. By that time however, the relative position of our echo-adjusted change in the growth rate of the S&P 500 daily stock prices had fallen well below the level where the dividends expected to be paid in 2014-Q1 would set them, which was a significant factor in the rally of stock prices on Friday, 6 December 2013. That rally brought stock prices up to right about where 2014-Q1's expected dividends would place them.

In the absence of new noise events, we expect that stock prices will continue to bounce around at or near this level, with somewhat of a mild upward trend given that we're looking a positive expectation for future dividends associated with the ongoing focus of investors upon 2014-Q1.

Analyst Notes

We now have enough data to illustrate why we went to so much trouble to develop our echo-filtering technique. In the chart below, we show what our dividend-futures based model for forecasting stock prices would have predicted if we had not accounted for the disruptive event of the Great Dividend Raid rally, which ran from 15 November 2012 to 21 December 2012:

Here, we observe that a deviation develops between what our dividend futures-based model predicts and actual S&P 500 stock prices, which looks very much like a negative noise event - just as we expected would happen.

Our next chart shows how our model's forecast of S&P 500 stock prices behaves when we account for the presence of the echo effect:

What that means is that we can successfully adapt our model to account for the presence of the echo effect so that it will continue to work in anticipating the level of actual stock prices, where we expect stock prices to fall within the range forecast by our model.

As a practical matter, we think that it would only be necessary to use this filtering technique to account for those echoes of significant past events that could otherwise lead to large deviations between actual observations and forecast values, as the typical level of noise we observe in stock prices already incorporates a contribution from the echoes produced by previous noise.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Stock Charts and News

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.