to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Since we mentioned the New York Times yesterday, we thought it might be time to look again at the business health of the nation's "most influential" newspaper. A year ago, we looked at the circulation figures the New York Times presented in their annual reports to the Security and Exchange Commission going all the way back to 1993. So now, a year later, we're doing the same to see how the Gray Lady has fared.
It's not pretty. First, here's the New York Times' weekday (Monday through Friday) circulation figures from 1993 through 2006:
We find that within the 31 county area that includes and surrounds New York City, and which encompasses the New York Times' home market, circulation has now dropped 30.0% below its 1993 peak. Meanwhile, when we include the newspaper's national circulation, we find that the New York Times' total circulation has dropped some 6.7% below its 1993 peak.
The following table provides the year-by-year weekday circulation data provided by the New York Times in their annual filings with the SEC:
New York Times Weekday Circulation, 1993-2006 |
---|
Year | Weekday Circulation (Mon-Fri) | Percentage of Total Circulation in NYC | Weekday Circulation Within NYC Market | Weekday Circulation Outside NYC Market |
---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | 1,183,100 | 64 | 757,184 | 425,916 |
1994 | 1,148,800 | 64 | 735,232 | 413,568 |
1995 | 1,124,300 | 62 | 697,066 | 427,234 |
1996 | 1,111,800 | 62 | 689,316 | 422,484 |
1997 | 1,090,900 | 62 | 676,358 | 414,542 |
1998 | 1,088,100 | 61 | 663,741 | 424,359 |
1999 | 1,109,700 | 60 | 665,820 | 443,880 |
2000 | 1,122,400 | 59 | 662,216 | 460,184 |
2001 | 1,143,700 | 58 | 663,346 | 480,354 |
2002 | 1,131,400 | 55 | 622,270 | 509,130 |
2003 | 1,132,000 | 53 | 599,960 | 532,040 |
2004 | 1,124,700 | 50 | 562,350 | 562,350 |
2005 | 1,135,800 | 49 | 556,542 | 579,258 |
2006 | 1,103,600 | 48 | 529,728 | 573,872 |
The data in the table confirms that the New York Times has primarily become a national newspaper at the expense of its home market. In 1993, the 31-county New York City market represented 64% of its total circulation. In 2006 however, the New York City market represents just 48% of its total weekday circulation.
The data also confirms that the first drop in the newspaper's national year-over-year circulation figures since its management began focusing on a national publication strategy in 1998, as this figure declined by 0.94%.
But what about the Sunday edition of the New York Times? How has it fared over this period?
Would you believe worse? The following chart illustates the decline of the New York Times' Sunday edition:
We find that the New York Times' circulation in its home market has steadily dropped to a figure 35.9% below its peak value in 1993. Meanwhile, when we add the newspaper's national circulation to the totals in 2006, we find that it has declined by 8.2% since 1993's peak.
The table below provides the year-by-year circulation figures for the New York Times' Sunday edition:
New York Times Sunday Circulation, 1993-2006 |
---|
Year | Sunday Circulation | Percentage of Total Circulation in NYC | Sunday Circulation Within NYC Market | Sunday Circulation Outside NYC Market |
---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | 1,783,900 | 63 | 1,123,857 | 660,043 |
1994 | 1,742,200 | 63 | 1,097,586 | 644,614 |
1995 | 1,720,300 | 60 | 1,032,180 | 688,120 |
1996 | 1,701,800 | 60 | 1,021,080 | 680,720 |
1997 | 1,651,400 | 59 | 974,326 | 677,074 |
1998 | 1,638,900 | 58 | 950,562 | 688,338 |
1999 | 1,671,200 | 56 | 935,872 | 735,328 |
2000 | 1,686,700 | 55 | 927,685 | 759,015 |
2001 | 1,659,900 | 53 | 879,747 | 780,153 |
2002 | 1,682,100 | 51 | 857,871 | 824,229 |
2003 | 1,682,100 | 49 | 824,229 | 857,871 |
2004 | 1,669,700 | 47 | 784,759 | 884,941 |
2005 | 1,684,700 | 44 | 741,268 | 943,432 |
2006 | 1,637,700 | 44 | 720,588 | 917,112 |
Again, we find that 2006 marked the first year in which the Times' circulation outside the NYC market, fell from the previous year since the newspaper's management began focusing on growing its national circulation in 1998. The year over year drop from 2005 to 2006 represents a 2.8% decrease in the Sunday edition's circulation.
We wonder if these declines in the output of the New York Times in 2006 might account for the perception of its reporter, David Leonhardt ($$$), that the entire U.S. manufacturing sector is in recession, despite all evidence to the contrary since he made his statement in February 2007. (HT: Tom Blumer)
In any case, the substantial declines of both the weekday editions and the Sunday edition of the newspaper suggest, combined with recent changes by the newspaper's management that will likely accelerate these trends, means that the New York Times is running out of time and thus, the Gray Lady is fading into the twilight of its existence. At very least, as we have known it.
Labels: business
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.