to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Sometime, within the next twelve to eighteen months, the average circulation of the weekday edition of the New York Times will drop below one million. This event marks the continuing decline in the fortunes of what had been the U.S. newspaper of record as the New York Times' average circulation has been well above this level for decades.
We base this prediction upon data recently provided by the New York Times Company in its annual report, which it released earlier this year. Combined with circulation data provided by the Grey Lady's parent company in its previous Securites and Exchange Commission financial data filings, we've updated our charts showing the trend in the New York Times' weekday circulation since it peaked in 1993:
The table below provides the circulation numbers that we used to create the chart above, both nationally and within the newspaper's home region. Clicking the "Year" links provides the relevant NYT's SEC filing for the indicated year, from which we obtained the newspaper's circulation data, which is reported in the section of the annual report in which the company's management discusses its business:
New York Times Average Weekday Circulation, 1993 through 2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Weekday Circulation (Mon-Fri) | Weekday Percentage of Total Circulation in NYC | Weekday Circulation Within NYC Market | Weekday Circulation Outside NYC Market | Percentage Decline of Total Weekday Circulation |
1993 | 1,183,100 | 64 | 757,184 | 425,916 | 0.0 |
1994 | 1,148,800 | 64 | 735,232 | 413,568 | -2.9 |
1995 | 1,124,300 | 62 | 697,066 | 427,234 | -5.0 |
1996 | 1,111,800 | 62 | 689,316 | 422,484 | -6.0 |
1997 | 1,090,900 | 62 | 676,358 | 414,542 | -7.8 |
1998 | 1,088,100 | 61 | 663,741 | 424,359 | -8.0 |
1999 | 1,109,700 | 60 | 665,820 | 443,880 | -6.2 |
2000 | 1,122,400 | 59 | 662,216 | 460,184 | -5.1 |
2001 | 1,143,700 | 58 | 663,346 | 480,354 | -3.3 |
2002 | 1,131,400 | 55 | 622,270 | 509,130 | -4.4 |
2003 | 1,132,000 | 53 | 599,960 | 532,040 | -4.3 |
2004 | 1,124,700 | 50 | 562,350 | 562,350 | -4.9 |
2005 | 1,135,800 | 49 | 556,542 | 579,258 | -4.0 |
2006 | 1,103,600 | 48 | 529,728 | 573,872 | -6.7 |
2007 | 1,066,600 | 47 | 501,302 | 565,298 | -9.8 |
The New York Times had staved off a greater circulation decline through its strategy of moving to become a national newspaper in the late 1990s. However, this national strategy has not been successful in holding off the newspaper's decline in total circulation since 2001. More importantly, between 2006 and 2007, the New York Times' circulation decline has accelerated, which is evident in the steeper downward slope in the chart.
In fact, the NYT management's strategy may well have also accelerated the newspaper's circulation decline in its home market, which is evident in the steeper decline seen in the chart above, as the publishers and editors (the newspaper's management) have effectively chosen to ignore crafting a more successful product for its home market in favor of chasing higher circulation in the national market.
These problems are compounded by the New York Times' management's longstanding leftist tilt in the newspaper's news and editorial coverage, which effectively sabotages the newspaper's ability to successfully reach a wider, more politically diverse, audience by limiting the newspaper's attractiveness to consumers in that bigger market.
The New York Times' circulation decline is not limited to its weekday editions. The same trend of decline is evident even in the newspaper's larger Sunday circulation data. The chart below shows the trend in the New York Times' circulation since 1993:
And for good measure, here's our table showing the data underlying the trends shown in the New York Times Sunday circulation chart:
New York Times Average Sunday Circulation, 1993 through 2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Sunday Circulation | Sunday Percentage of Total Circulation in NYC | Sunday Circulation Within NYC Market | Sunday Circulation Outside NYC Market | Percentage Decline of Total Sunday Circulation |
1993 | 1,783,900 | 63 | 1,123,857 | 660,043 | 0.0 |
1994 | 1,742,200 | 63 | 1,097,586 | 644,614 | -2.3 |
1995 | 1,720,300 | 60 | 1,032,180 | 688,120 | -3.6 |
1996 | 1,701,800 | 60 | 1,021,080 | 680,720 | -4.6 |
1997 | 1,651,400 | 59 | 974,326 | 677,074 | -7.4 |
1998 | 1,638,900 | 58 | 950,562 | 688,338 | -8.1 |
1999 | 1,671,200 | 56 | 935,872 | 735,328 | -6.3 |
2000 | 1,686,700 | 55 | 927,685 | 759,015 | -5.4 |
2001 | 1,659,900 | 53 | 879,747 | 780,153 | -7.0 |
2002 | 1,682,100 | 51 | 857,871 | 824,229 | -5.7 |
2003 | 1,682,100 | 49 | 824,229 | 857,871 | -5.7 |
2004 | 1,669,700 | 47 | 784,759 | 884,941 | -6.4 |
2005 | 1,684,700 | 44 | 741,268 | 943,432 | -5.6 |
2006 | 1,637,700 | 44 | 720,588 | 917,112 | -8.2 |
2007 | 1,529,700 | 42 | 642,474 | 887,226 | -14.2 |
The declines documented above reflect a worsening business situation for the New York Times, as lower circulation figures point to lower revenues realized through advertising and subscriptions. While the New York Times is now moving to grow its online presence and corresponding advertising revenues, online ads generate far less revenue than do traditional advertisements, which strains the company's financial performance.
This distress is evident in the newspaper's stock price, which we've shown from January 1998 through March 2008 (to date), in the chart below (via Yahoo! Finance):
The price of the New York Times' Company stock grew as the newspaper transitioned to become a national newspaper up until 2001, reflecting the peak of the newspaper's success with this strategy in holding off greater declines. However, since then, the company's stock price has dropped with its declining fortunes.
Labels: business
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.