Having established that a new trend in employee layoffs began between 14 November 2009 and 21 November 2009, we've modified the statistical chart we originally presented yesterday to show its full extent.
In doing that, we also recalculated the typical range of natural variation we would expect to see for the previous trend, and in doing so, found an anomaly. The data for 11 July 2009 falls outside that range, which is defined as being within three standard deviations of the mean linear trend line for the data defining the trend.
We recognize this point as an outlier in the data for the trend that existed between 28 March 2009 and 14 November 2009, in that the following data points quickly returned to follow the primary trend line. But we also recognize that there must be a specific cause for such a deviation from the trend.
As it happens, the only economic factor that could have impacted the decision of businesses for retaining employees that occurred at this time is the government's Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS, aka "Cash for Clunkers") stimulus program.
As we noted yesterday, changes in established trends for seasonally adjusted initial unemployment claim filings typically lag two to three weeks behind the events that change the future economic outlook for businesses. With the Cash for Clunkers program signed into law on 24 June 2009 and taking effect on 1 July 2009, we find no other coinciding events that would potentially affect business staffing decisions on a large scale. The program ran through 24 August 2009.
With the program's limited duration, the benefits for American workers in the form of avoided layoffs from the stimulus program were very short-lived. We note that before the dates of the program, the number of initial unemployment claims filed were above the trend line in 10 of 13 weeks, while following the program, the number of initial unemployment claims filed were above the trend line in 7 of 12 weeks. During the program's run, the number of initial unemployment claims filed were only above the trend line in three of eight weeks, indicating that the program was successful in avoiding a higher number of layoffs in the other five weeks that it ran.
The data indicates that the Cash for Clunkers program did not significantly alter the established trend in layoffs during this period, which was declining in any case.
Which brings us to the present. We were incorrect in stating yesterday that Geoff of Innocent Bystanders hadn't identified a potential cause driving the current trend in U.S. layoffs. He did, finding that the introduction of health care legislation in the House of Representatives on 29 October 2009 was the likely cause of the deviation from the previously established trend, fully beating us to an analysis-based conclusion that was the likely cause by two weeks! And then, he first speculated that might the case back on 15 April 2010, long before we began putting the pieces together ourselves.
Yeah, we've added Innocent Bystanders to our blog roll!...
Labels: jobs
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
CSS Validation
RSS Site Feed
JavaScript
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.
Other Cool Resources
Blog Roll
