Unexpectedly Intriguing!
January 5, 2011

We were kind of amused over our year-end break to see that the lame-duck 111th U.S. Congress' Joint Economic Committee was out proclaiming that "the recovery from the Great Recession continues, and is occurring more quickly than the recoveries from the 2001 and 1990-1991 recessions." (HT: Carpe Diem)

In fact, we were so amused by that claim that we decided to check it out. To do that, we borrowed Calculated Risk's recession job loss and recovery data for each recession since World War II and worked out how long it took for each recession's job recovery to reclaim the jobs lost from the previous payroll employment peak, as indexed from the points at which maximum non-farm job loss occurred in each recession.

Our results are graphically presented below:

Percentage of Maximum Job Losses in Post WWII Recessions, Aligned at Maximum Job Losses, through November 2010

What we find is that as of November 2010, the 2007 recession does indeed feature the slowest non-farm job recovery of any recession after hitting bottom, both going by CR's adjusted bottoms for the 1990 and 2001 recessions (shown above) and the exact maximum job loss point for all recessions.

We don't know what exactly the Joint Economic Committee was doing during the lame-duck session of the U.S. Congress, but clearly, objectively verifiable facts weren't getting in their way of doing it! More seriously, the JEC's statement is accurate as far as it goes, but suffers from focusing on measuring change from when the recession was arbitrarily determined to be over in 2009, which comes at the expense of grasping the bigger picture - jobs were continuing to be shed from the economy well after June 2009. Economic myopia like this is common among politically-motivated groups1, where distorted views of reality often prevail.

That said, we're more optimistic that 2011 will see a much stronger recovery in jobs than did 2010, but then, it would be hard for it not to do so, wouldn't it?

1 Update: The JEC report was "Prepared by the Majority Staff of the Joint Economic Committee", who in this case, would be the Democratic staff members of the Joint Economic Committee for the now defunct 111th U.S. Congress.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Applications

This year, we'll be experimenting with a number of apps to bring more of a current events focus to Political Calculations - we're test driving the app(s) below!

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links
Charities We Support
Recommended Reading
Recommended Viewing
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Archives
Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.