Political Calculations
April 16, 2012

With the release of the BLS' report for 2011 on the Characteristic of Minimum Wage Earners, we can now update our pioneering chart illustrating how the federal minimum wage-earning composition of the U.S. workforce has changed in each year since 2006.

Here, we start with the year 2006 because that is the last full year, before 2010, in which the U.S. federal minimum wage was set at a constant level throughout the entire calendar year. Using our very accurate model of the income distribution of that year, we then measure the difference between the number of jobs recorded at each year's minimum wage level to the same number recorded at the same reference wage levels in 2006, taking into account the amount of time at which a given minimum wage level applied during each year.

The result is the candlestick-style chart below, where the horizontal axis defines the break between those earning the time-weighted federal minimum wage or less for the indicated years, which are shown below that "zero" line. The purple vertical bars show the full number of people recorded as being employed during the year, while any black ends show where reductions in the U.S. workforce have occurred since 2006. The values shown on the chart indicate the size of the change of the "above" or "below" minimum wage workforce for the indicated years with respect to the starting year of 2006.

Reading the chart from left to right, we see that 2007 saw some 402,850 jobs lost from the U.S. economy, which were all below the time-weighted minimum wage level for that year, as the otherwise growing economy of that year added 2,033,767 jobs above the minimum wage line. The U.S. federal minimum wage was increased in July 2007 from $5.15 per hour to $5.85 per hour.

In 2008, the economy added some 46,482 jobs above the time-weighted minimum wage line for that year, raising the total difference from 2006's job level above the federal minimum wage level to 2,080,249. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy shed an additional 725,982 jobs paying the federal minimum wage or less, as the full difference with respect to 2006 for jobs paying the federal minimum wage or less fell to 1,128,832.

The federal minimum wage was increased in July 2008 to $6.55 per hour.

For all practical purposes, the net job losses that occurred during the first year of the recession that officially began in December 2007, as measured from the peak of the previous period of economic expansion that took place in that month, were entirely confined within the minimum wage-earning portion of the U.S. workforce.

That situation changed in 2009 with the fallout from the rapid decline of the U.S. automotive industry. Here, compared to 2008, a total of 4,919,970 jobs paying more than the federal minimum wage were lost in 2009, which brings the total number of jobs paying more than the federal minimum wage down to be 2,839,721 lower than the number of jobs paying more than the same time-weighted minimum wage levels of 2006.

Things continued to go badly for those earning the federal minimum wage or less, as another 563,613 fewer people disappeared from this portion of the U.S. workforce as compared to the previous year, bringing the total reduction with respect to the number of people being paid the same wage level or less in 2006 to 1,691,445.

We note that the recession that officially began in December 2007 officially ended in June 2009. July 2009 marks the last increase in the U.S. federal minimum wage, reaching its current level of $7.25 per hour.

2010 saw job losses continue both above and below the now steady U.S. federal minimum wage level. Compared to the previous year, an additional 274,896 people earning more than the U.S. federal minimum wage disappeared from the U.S. workforce, while another 542,938 people earning the U.S. federal minimum wage or less also disappeared from the U.S. workforce. These year over year changes bring the difference with respect to the same wage levels in 2006 to a reduction of 3,114,617 for those earning more than the federal minimum wage, and a total reduction of 2,234,383 for those earning the federal minimum wage or less in 2010.

2011 marked the first real year of improvement for those earning more than the federal minimum wage, as the number of people in this category increased by 1,335,584 over the level recorded in 2010. Compared to 2006 however, there are still 1,779,033 fewer people with jobs that pay more than $7.25 per hour today.

But the bleeding has yet to stop for those who earn the federal minimum wage or less. Here, we observe that 2011 saw 531,000 fewer people earning the federal minimum wage of $7.25 or less, lowering the number of people earning those wages to be 2,765,383 below the same level for 2006.

The average number of individuals earning the federal minimum wage or less has decreased by 551,855 per year since 2006, with the best year being 2007 when only 396,744 such jobs disappeared and the worst year being 2008, when 725,982 such jobs vanished from the U.S. economy.

Labels: ,



<< Home
Unexpectedly Intriguing!

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

The Prediction

The Age Demographics of Minimum Wage Earners

Will You Ever Be 100?

Updated: The Future for Dividends through 2013Q1

Jobs Stall Out in March 2012

What's for Dinner? What?!

Finding the Price of Quiet

Who Is the Best Pitcher in Baseball?

Data Revision: Major Trends in U.S. New Jobless Cl...

Finalized: GDP Forecast for 2012Q1

Elsewhere on the Web

This year, we'll be experimenting with a number of apps to bring more of a current events focus to Political Calculations - we're test driving the app(s) below!

Most Popular Posts

The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips

The Distribution of Income for 2010: Individuals

Should You Trade in Your Gas Guzzler?

What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?

Tipping Around the World

What's Your Body Fat Percentage?

The Odds of Dying, Again!

Gas Prices, the Unemployment Rate, and Desperation

Hauser's Law

The Real Story Behind "Rising" U.S. Income Inequality

Quick Index

First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?

On the Moneyed Midways

A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools

U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge

Political Calculations' GDP Temperature Gauge, 2013Q1 First Estimate Political Calculations' U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge provides a means to quickly evaluate the growth rate of the U.S. economy against the backdrop of how the economy has performed since 1980, with the "temperature" color spectrum ranging from a recessionary "cold" (purple) through an expansionary "hot" (red).

The GDP Temperature Gauge presents both the annualized GDP growth rate as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports for a one-quarter period and also as averaged over a two quarter period, which smooths out the volatility seen in the one-quarter data and provides a better indication of the relative strength of the U.S. economy over time.

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

ZunZun - Exceptional regression analysis tool.
Wolfram Integrator - Solve integrals. Do calculus!
Create a Graph - Easy-to-use basic graph-making tool.
Many Eyes - Data visualization extraordinaire!
Wolfram Alpha - Computational knowledge engine.
Khan Academy - Math & science video mini-lectures!
Picasion - Animate images.


Archives
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013

Blog Roll

Bloodhoundblog
Budgets Are Sexy
Cafe Hayek
Carpe Diem
Core77
Coyote Blog
Craig Harper
Darwin's Finance
Digerati Life, The
Division of Labour
Dough Roller, The
Eclectecon
Econlog
Economics Roundtable
EconomicsUK
Environmental Economics
Escape from Cubicle Nation
Execupundit
FiscalGeek
Get Rich Slowly
Gongol
Good Financial Cents
HR Bartender
Hot Air
i4cp Productivity
Innocent Bystanders
Innovation and Growth
Instapundit
Intangible Economy
I've Paid Twice for This Already
Joanne Jacobs
Kaus Files
Len Penzo dot Com
Making Ripples
Market Power
Mechonomics
Mighty Bargain Hunter
Monevator
My Dollar Plan
New Economist
Newmark's Door
Nina Simosko
Physorg
Private Sector Development
Real Clear Politics
Richard Fernandez
Roger L. Simon
Rowan Manahan
Sound Politics
SOX First
Sports Economist, The
squawkfox
Three Star Leadership
Tim Worstall
Townhall
Trusted Advisor
Uncommon Misperceptions
voluntaryXchange
WILLisms
Winterspeak

Market Links

Big Picture, The
Crackerjack Finance
CXO Advisory Group
Disciplined Approach to Investing
Dividend Guy, The
Doug Short
Evidence Investing
Fat Pitch Financials
FX Investment Strategies
Oilprice

Charities We Support

American Red Cross
Children's Heart Foundation
Salvation Army
SMA Foundation

Recommended Reading

Kindle Paperwhite 3G - Best e-reader!
Angel in the Whirlwind
Bailout Nation
Cartoon Guide to Statistics
A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War
The Complete Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant
The Count of Monte Cristo
Ender's Game
Gardner's Art Through the Ages
Empire of Wealth
How to Make Presentations to Councils and Boards
Juran's Quality Handbook
Marks' Standard Handbook
The Second World War
Stocks for the Long Run
Why Smart Executives Fail

Recommended Viewing

The Tudors: The Complete Series

Recently Shopped

Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G LTE Wireless 32 GB
Snap Circuits Jr. SC-100
Nerf Vortex Praxis
Sony BRAVIA 40" LED HDTV
2540 Series Docking Station
New Balance MX623
Dunham Men's Waterproof Oxford
TN360 Black Toner Cartridge
The Dangerous Book for Boys
Air Swimmer Remote Control Inflatable Flying Shark
Fisher-Price Little People Lil Pirate Ship

Seeking Alpha Certified