Unexpectedly Intriguing!
18 May 2010

Barry Ritholtz asks if a repeat of the 1987 crash is impossible or likely. He looks at the market now and then (Update - see note below the post) before concluding:

The key differences have nothing to do with who was quoted, or the articles authors or their editors. What had changed was the psychology of the moment. And THAT, more than anything, impacts how people perceive the world . . .

Looking at the 1987 Black Monday crash a bit differently, that's exactly correct, although we find fundamental reasons for doing so, both then and now. We think that the current state of the market is such that it's more reminiscent of the 1930s than 1987 - especially since April, when the future expectations of investors appear to have sharply shifted downward, for which we don't yet have the data to confirm if that apparent shift in sentiment is a reaction to a change in the fundamental outlook for the market or is simply the result of noise. Our thinking is that it's more fundamentally driven.

Flash Crash 6 May 2010 - Source: WSJ, via Barry Ritholtz Here's why. The May 6 plunge is a clear, almost perfect example of a disruptive noise event in the market - a dramatic change in prices that isn't sustained and that is not correlated with changes in the expected growth rate of dividends per share. The combination indicates that the so-called "flash crash" qualifies as being the result of noise in the market.

That the market recovered quickly to the level indicated by where the apparent investor future expectations for dividends would place them, neither going significantly higher or lower, despite the free and clear opportunity provided by the flash crash to do so, would seem to confirm that observation.

Instead, how the market is currently acting suggests that something fundamentally altered the future outlook of investors in a way where they now expect the level of dividends per share in the market to fall significantly from their current levels at some, as yet unknown, point in the future, which is why stocks may be expected to continue trending lower in the near term.

What we know today is that shift in outlook took place in April 2010. What we don't yet know is to what future point in time investors are looking forward. Sadly, our crystal ball can only see ahead to December 2010.

Image Source: The Wall Street Journal, which offers an interactive version of the chart!

Update 18 May 2010, 11:19 AM EDT: We should note that Barry is primarily considering the change in investor psychology as documented in the pages of the Wall Street Journal between 2007 and 2010, with the 1987 crash thrown in to note the parallels between it and the "flash crash". His main thesis is that in 2007, the possibility of something similar to the Black Monday Crash happening again was unthinkable, while today, investor expectations are very different.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Indices, Futures, and Bonds

Closing values for previous trading day.

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button


The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.