to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Following the release of the largest study of cancer ever for Europe, we previously compared the U.S. and Europe with regard to five-year cancer survival rates for all types of cancer, but that left open two big questions:
To find out where Canada ranks among the U.S. and the various nations of Europe, we turned to the National Cancer Institute of Canada's recently released report Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007, which provides the five-year cancer survival rates for all types of cancer for all the provinces of Canada but Quebec. We've incorporated this data into the following chart, which now shows where the U.S., Canada and the nations of Europe rank with respect to each other in this measure of health care effectiveness:
The chart above shows the breakdown of five year cancer survival rates between men and women for patients diagnosed with the condition between 2000 and 2002. The data for the European nations and the U.S. comes from the Eurocare-4 study, and is ranked according to the percentage of women who, after being initially diagnosed with cancer, have survived for at least five years.
The chart reveals that the U.S. ranks at the top when it comes to surviving cancer, but with Canada closely behind, generally ranking ahead of all the nations of Europe. The exception is for Swedish men, who come in second for overall survival rates.
We should also note that the Canadian data is not presented with the same accuracy as the European and U.S. data, which may affect the nation's position in the scale due to errors in rounding the underlying numbers.
We next turned our attention to how the U.S. and Europe compared with respect to different kinds of cancer. For that, we turned to Jody of the PolySciFi Blog, who shelled out good money for the Eurocare-4 report presented in the August 2007 edition of The Lancet Oncology. We've presented the data she originally posted in an easier-to-read dynamic table format, which you may sort by clicking the various column headings:
| US, Europe Five Year Survival Rates by Type of Cancer |
|---|
| Type of Cancer | Europe | US | Better 5-Year Survival Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stomach | 24.9 (23.7-26.2) | 25.0 (23.8-26.2) | Par |
| Colorectal | 56.2 (55.3-57.2) | 65.5 (64.9-66.1) | US |
| Lung | 10.9 (10.5-11.4) | 15.7 (15.3-16.1) | US |
| Soft-tissue | 61.2 (58.3-64.2) | 65.1 (62.8-67.5) | US |
| Skin | 86.1 (84.3-88.0) | 92.3 (91.5-93.1) | US |
| Breast | 79.0 (78.1-80.0) | 90.1 (89.6-90.5) | US |
| Cervix | 60.4 (57.7-63.2) | 65.8 (64.1-67.6) | US |
| Uterine | 78.0 (76.2-79.9) | 82.3 (81.2-83.4) | US |
| Prostate | 77.5 (76.5-78.6) | 99.3 (98.9-99.8) | US |
| Testicular | 97.3 (96.4-98.2) | 95.4 (94.0-96.8) | Europe |
| Kidney | 55.7 (53.6-58.0) | 62.6 (61.3-63.9) | US |
| Thyroid | 83.2 (80.9-85.6) | 93.5 (92.2-94.8) | US |
| Hodgkin's | 81.4 (78.9-84.1) | 80.6 (78.8-82.4) | Par |
| Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma | 54.6 (52.7-56.6) | 62.0 (61.0-63.0) | US |
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia | 14.8 (13.4-16.4) | 13.9 (12.6-15.2) | Par |
| Chronic Myeloid Leukemia | 32.2 (29.0-35.7) | 36.0 (33.1-39.1) | US |
| All Men | 47.3 (46.8-47.8) | 66.3 (66.0-66.6) | US |
| All Women | 55.8 (55.3-56.2) | 62.9 (62.6-63.2) | US |
In the table above, the first value given for the European and U.S. data is the average five-year survival rate and the range given in parentheses provides the 95% confidence interval for the data. The final column reveals which region between the U.S. and Europe provides better outcomes, with a ranking of par indicating that cancer survival rates between the two regions are roughly equivalent for the indicated type of cancer.
We've omitted including Canadian statistics for this portion of analysis given that not all types of cancer survival rates included in the Eurocare-4 study were available in our available data and also due to the lower accuracy to which the numbers that have been reported have been presented.
We find in the table's data that the U.S. generally ranks well ahead of the nations of Europe for surviving nearly all types of cancer.
Labels: health
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips
Mapping S&P 500 Performance, Since 1871
Should You Trade In Your Gas Guzzler?
What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?
Reckoning the Odds of Recession
Your 2009 Paycheck
Tipping Around the World
Revisiting the Lottery
Estimating Your Life Expectancy
Connecting the Dots for Personal Income Taxes
First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?
On the Moneyed Midways
A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools
Political Calculations' Recession Probability Track shows the probability that the U.S. economy will be in recession 12 months from the indicated date (shown in red) while revealing the probability trend over the past four years.
Previously, the probability of recession peaked at 50% on 4 April 2007, which means that March-April 2008 was the most likely period in which the NBER would have found the U.S. to be in recession.
As it happens, they almost did. The NBER instead chose December 2007 as the beginning month of the most recent recession (we had found a 46% probability for a recession beginning in that month!)
Political Calculations is also the online home of On the Moneyed Midways (aka OMM), a review of the best posts contributed to the week's best business and money-related blog carnivals. More than that, we also name one post in each edition as being The Best Post of the Week, Anywhere! and at the end of each year, we name The Best Post of the Year, Anywhere! as well as identifying the best blogs we found during the course of the year!
The link below will take you to the running index containing our most recent back issues (you can easily navigate the index to find older editions.)
This site is primarily powered by:
Visitors since December 6, 2004:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.
ZunZun - Exceptional regression analysis tool.
Wolfram Integrator - Solve integrals. Do calculus!
Create a Graph - Easy-to-use basic graph-making tool.
Many Eyes - Data visualization extraordinaire!