to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Following the release of the largest study of cancer ever for Europe, we previously compared the U.S. and Europe with regard to five-year cancer survival rates for all types of cancer, but that left open two big questions:
To find out where Canada ranks among the U.S. and the various nations of Europe, we turned to the National Cancer Institute of Canada's recently released report Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007, which provides the five-year cancer survival rates for all types of cancer for all the provinces of Canada but Quebec. We've incorporated this data into the following chart, which now shows where the U.S., Canada and the nations of Europe rank with respect to each other in this measure of health care effectiveness:
The chart above shows the breakdown of five year cancer survival rates between men and women for patients diagnosed with the condition between 2000 and 2002. The data for the European nations and the U.S. comes from the Eurocare-4 study, and is ranked according to the percentage of women who, after being initially diagnosed with cancer, have survived for at least five years.
The chart reveals that the U.S. ranks at the top when it comes to surviving cancer, but with Canada closely behind, generally ranking ahead of all the nations of Europe. The exception is for Swedish men, who come in second for overall survival rates.
We should also note that the Canadian data is not presented with the same accuracy as the European and U.S. data, which may affect the nation's position in the scale due to errors in rounding the underlying numbers.
We next turned our attention to how the U.S. and Europe compared with respect to different kinds of cancer. For that, we turned to Jody of the PolySciFi Blog, who shelled out good money for the Eurocare-4 report presented in the August 2007 edition of The Lancet Oncology. We've presented the data she originally posted in an easier-to-read dynamic table format, which you may sort by clicking the various column headings:
| US, Europe Five Year Survival Rates by Type of Cancer |
|---|
| Type of Cancer | Europe | US | Better 5-Year Survival Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stomach | 24.9 (23.7-26.2) | 25.0 (23.8-26.2) | Par |
| Colorectal | 56.2 (55.3-57.2) | 65.5 (64.9-66.1) | US |
| Lung | 10.9 (10.5-11.4) | 15.7 (15.3-16.1) | US |
| Soft-tissue | 61.2 (58.3-64.2) | 65.1 (62.8-67.5) | US |
| Skin | 86.1 (84.3-88.0) | 92.3 (91.5-93.1) | US |
| Breast | 79.0 (78.1-80.0) | 90.1 (89.6-90.5) | US |
| Cervix | 60.4 (57.7-63.2) | 65.8 (64.1-67.6) | US |
| Uterine | 78.0 (76.2-79.9) | 82.3 (81.2-83.4) | US |
| Prostate | 77.5 (76.5-78.6) | 99.3 (98.9-99.8) | US |
| Testicular | 97.3 (96.4-98.2) | 95.4 (94.0-96.8) | Europe |
| Kidney | 55.7 (53.6-58.0) | 62.6 (61.3-63.9) | US |
| Thyroid | 83.2 (80.9-85.6) | 93.5 (92.2-94.8) | US |
| Hodgkin's | 81.4 (78.9-84.1) | 80.6 (78.8-82.4) | Par |
| Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma | 54.6 (52.7-56.6) | 62.0 (61.0-63.0) | US |
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia | 14.8 (13.4-16.4) | 13.9 (12.6-15.2) | Par |
| Chronic Myeloid Leukemia | 32.2 (29.0-35.7) | 36.0 (33.1-39.1) | US |
| All Men | 47.3 (46.8-47.8) | 66.3 (66.0-66.6) | US |
| All Women | 55.8 (55.3-56.2) | 62.9 (62.6-63.2) | US |
In the table above, the first value given for the European and U.S. data is the average five-year survival rate and the range given in parentheses provides the 95% confidence interval for the data. The final column reveals which region between the U.S. and Europe provides better outcomes, with a ranking of par indicating that cancer survival rates between the two regions are roughly equivalent for the indicated type of cancer.
We've omitted including Canadian statistics for this portion of analysis given that not all types of cancer survival rates included in the Eurocare-4 study were available in our available data and also due to the lower accuracy to which the numbers that have been reported have been presented.
We find in the table's data that the U.S. generally ranks well ahead of the nations of Europe for surviving nearly all types of cancer.
Labels: health
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips
The Distribution of Income for 2010: Individuals
Should You Trade in Your Gas Guzzler?
What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?
Tipping Around the World
What's Your Body Fat Percentage?
The Odds of Dying, Again!
Gas Prices, the Unemployment Rate, and Desperation
Hauser's Law
The Real Story Behind "Rising" U.S. Income Inequality
First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?
On the Moneyed Midways
A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools
Political Calculations' U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge provides a means to quickly evaluate the growth rate of the U.S. economy against the backdrop of how the economy has performed since 1980, with the "temperature" color spectrum ranging from a recessionary "cold" (purple) through an expansionary "hot" (red).
The GDP Temperature Gauge presents both the annualized GDP growth rate as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports for a one-quarter period and also as averaged over a two quarter period, which smooths out the volatility seen in the one-quarter data and provides a better indication of the relative strength of the U.S. economy over time.
This site is primarily powered by:
Visitors since December 6, 2004:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.
ZunZun - Exceptional regression analysis tool.
Wolfram Integrator - Solve integrals. Do calculus!
Create a Graph - Easy-to-use basic graph-making tool.
Many Eyes - Data visualization extraordinaire!
Wolfram Alpha - Computational knowledge engine.
Khan Academy - Math & science video mini-lectures!
Picasion - Animate images.
Bloodhoundblog
Budgets Are Sexy
Cafe Hayek
Carpe Diem
Core77
Coyote Blog
Craig Harper
Darwin's Finance
Digerati Life, The
Division of Labour
Dough Roller, The
Eclectecon
Econlog
Economics Roundtable
EconomicsUK
Environmental Economics
Escape from Cubicle Nation
Execupundit
FiscalGeek
Get Rich Slowly
Gongol
Good Financial Cents
HR Bartender
Hot Air
i4cp Productivity
Innocent Bystanders
Innovation and Growth
Instapundit
Intangible Economy
I've Paid Twice for This Already
Joanne Jacobs
Kaus Files
Len Penzo dot Com
Making Ripples
Market Power
Mechonomics
Mighty Bargain Hunter
Monevator
My Dollar Plan
New Economist
Newmark's Door
Nina Simosko
Physorg
Private Sector Development
Real Clear Politics
Richard Fernandez
Roger L. Simon
Rowan Manahan
Sound Politics
SOX First
Sports Economist, The
squawkfox
Three Star Leadership
Tim Worstall
Townhall
Trusted Advisor
Uncommon Misperceptions
voluntaryXchange
WILLisms
Winterspeak
Big Picture, The
Crackerjack Finance
CXO Advisory Group
Disciplined Approach to Investing
Dividend Guy, The
Doug Short
Evidence Investing
Fat Pitch Financials
FX Investment Strategies
Oilprice
American Red Cross
Children's Heart Foundation
Salvation Army
SMA Foundation
Kindle Paperwhite 3G - Best e-reader!
Angel in the Whirlwind
Bailout Nation
Cartoon Guide to Statistics
A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War
The Complete Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant
The Count of Monte Cristo
Ender's Game
Gardner's Art Through the Ages
Empire of Wealth
How to Make Presentations to Councils and Boards
Juran's Quality Handbook
Marks' Standard Handbook
The Second World War
Stocks for the Long Run
Why Smart Executives Fail
The Tudors: The Complete Series
Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G LTE Wireless 32 GB
Snap Circuits Jr. SC-100
Nerf Vortex Praxis
Sony BRAVIA 40" LED HDTV
2540 Series Docking Station
New Balance MX623
Dunham Men's Waterproof Oxford
TN360 Black Toner Cartridge
The Dangerous Book for Boys
Air Swimmer Remote Control Inflatable Flying Shark
Fisher-Price Little People Lil Pirate Ship