to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Now that we've established the concept of the Zero Deficit Line, which may be used to determine just how much money the typical American household can really afford for the U.S. government to spend each year, we're taking the next step and presenting a tool you can use to do the math for yourself!
We've set the default data to be that for 2009, but you're welcome to substitute your own income figure of interest to use in the tool below the graph. We'll have more comments below the tool....
Using the default data, we find that the federal government could only really afford to have spent $20,937 per household in 2009. So it should come as no surprise that the actual amount that the federal government spent of $29,928 per household resulted in the largest ever annual deficit in the history of the United States.
But how much would the median household income in the U.S. have to be so that the federal government could spend $29,928 per American household without producing much of a deficit?
Playing around with the income in the tool above, we found that the median household income in the U.S. would have to rise to be $70,097 in order for this level of government spending to not produce a significant budget deficit. That's about 41% higher than the actual median household income in 2009 of $49,777!
Now, getting the federal government to actually do what it takes to live within its means is a different story....
Labels: income, income distribution, taxes, tool
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.