to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Gold. Nothing glitters quite like it and, as we often hear on the advertisements that air on cable news channels, it's never been worth zero!
So what if we were to make the U.S. federal government pay every dollar it spends in gold rather than greenbacks?
No, we're not calling for a return to the gold standard, nor are we suggesting that you should go out and buy gold, which may not be as good an investment as the commercials claim. Instead, we think it might make for a neat way to better visualize just how much money the U.S. federal government spends on the things it does by finding out just how big a solid cube of gold of equivalent value would be.
Here's an example that we looked at recently. The federal government subsidizes U.S. fuel ethanol producers using a tax credit of 45 cents for every gallon they distill. In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has mandated that 12 billion gallons of fuel ethanol will be added to motor gasoline, so that means these producers can collectively expect to receive 5.4 billion dollars for all the ethanol they will supply.
But what if the federal government just dipped into Fort Knox and delivered the equivalent value in gold? Exactly how much gold would that be?
We built a tool to find out. Using the information, we find that this $5.4 billion transfer from U.S. taxpayers to U.S. ethanol producers is nearly the equivalent of a 6 foot long by a 6 foot wide by a 6 foot tall solid cube of pure gold weighing over 14 thousand pounds, at least if we go by the spot price for gold as we write this (click here for a more current spot price.)
And just for fun, what if the U.S. government had to pay the entire U.S. national debt of in gold? As of 1 February 2011, the total public debt outstanding was $14,109,942,89,903.50. Entering $14,109.9 into our tool with a spot price for gold of $1,332 per ounce indicates that paying off the entire U.S. national debt in gold would take nearly double the entire amount of gold ever found in the world.
In the meantime though, we're pretty sure that U.S. ethanol producers are pretty happy with the nearly 6' x 6' x 6' cube of gold they'll be getting in equivalent tax credits from the federal government this year. If they're looking for a place to keep it, we'd suggest the ShelterLogic 6x6x6.5 E Series Shed (Gray) from Amazon, which they might consider placing in their back yard. Perhaps by the pool.
After all, that's over 7 tons of gold. It's not like its going to walk away very easily....
Image Source: Juwelier Lachenmann GmbH
Labels: data visualization, tool
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips
Reckoning the Odds of Recession
Should You Trade in Your Gas Guzzler?
What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?
Tipping Around the World
What's Your Body Fat Percentage?
The Odds of Dying, Again!
The Biggest Issue of 2010, In One Chart
Hauser's Law
Average Lifetime Earnings Trajectories by Education
First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?
On the Moneyed Midways
A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools
Political Calculations' U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge provides a means to quickly evaluate the growth rate of the U.S. economy against the backdrop of how the economy has performed since 1980, with the "temperature" color spectrum ranging from a recessionary "cold" (purple) through an expansionary "hot" (red).
The GDP Temperature Gauge presents both the annualized GDP growth rate as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports for a one-quarter period and also as averaged over a two quarter period, which smooths out the volatility seen in the one-quarter data and provides a better indication of the relative strength of the U.S. economy over time.
Political Calculations' Recession Probability Track shows the probability that the U.S. economy will be in recession 12 months from the indicated date (shown in red) while revealing the probability trend over the past four years.
Previously, the probability of recession peaked at 50% on 4 April 2007, which means that March-April 2008 was the most likely period in which the NBER would have found the U.S. to be in recession.
As it happens, they almost did. The NBER instead chose December 2007 as the beginning month of the most recent recession (we had found a 46% probability for a recession beginning in that month!)
The Recession Probability Track ceased to be a leading indicator of recession in the U.S. following the Federal Reserve's adoption of its current Zero Interest Rate Policy, where the Fed artificially constrains short term U.S. Treasury yields near zero percent. We continue to post the Recession Probability Track to monitor the yield on the 10 Year Constant Maturity Treasury, where a falling value provides a leading indication of a worsening economy.