Unexpectedly Intriguing!
March 12, 2013

In February 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that some 143,492,000 Americans were counted as having jobs, as the official unemployment rate for the U.S. dropped to 7.7%. The last time that many Americans were employed was November 2008.

Breaking the employment numbers down by age group, the number of employed Americans included 4,376,000 teens (Age 16-19), 13,527,000 young adults (Age 20-24) and 125,589,000 adults (Age 25+).

Change in Number of Employed by Age Group Since Total Employment Peak in November 2007, as of February 2013

Since the level of total employment peaked at 146,595,000 in November 2007, just one month ahead of the economic peak marking the beginning of the so-called "Great Recession", there are some 3,103,000 fewer Americans working today. Of those, 50% (1,551,000) are between the ages of 16 and 19, while 15.3% are between the ages of 20 and 24, while the remaining 34.7% are Age 25 or older.

There has been no sustained improvement in the employment situation for U.S. teens since October 2009. That's four months after the "official" end to the Great Recession and three months after the most recent federal minimum wage increase.

Looking at the establishment portion of the survey, the U.S. economy appears to have added 236,000 non-farm payroll jobs in the month of February 2013 after seasonal adjustments, increasing that total to 135,046,000. (Note: The establishment survey data is subject to large revisions).

Of these new jobs, approximately 1 in 5 of the net gain are in the field of construction, primarily for specialty trade contractors (such as roofers, electricians, etc.), which account for two-thirds of the reported increase in the industry.

Number of People Employed as Specialty Trade Contractors in U.S. Housing Industry - Source: BLS

That suggests that the recent uptrend in the U.S. housing market that began after September 2012 is accelerating, which is acting as a positive factor for the U.S. economy, and which is offsetting a number of negative factors, such as the effects of the recent payroll tax hike and higher gasoline prices.

The Fed had announced on 13 September 2012 that it would launch a $40 billion per month quantitative easing program as part of the third edition of its various quantitative easing programs of recent years, where it would buy up mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S.-government support entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to try to further stimulate the U.S. economic recovery in this industry.

This aspect of the Fed's quantitative easing programs appears to be successful, as it offset otherwise negative circumstances that drug the U.S. economy down to near recessionary levels in the fourth quarter of 2012.

However, as we've frequently observed since the Fed's announcement, the latest QE program hasn't had much an impact at all on other asset prices, such as stock prices. Here, the Fed adjusted its existing transactions of U.S. Treasuries so that it would increase its net holdings of these securities by $45 billion per month. To do that, the Fed has continued acquiring U.S. Treasuries at the same rate as it was before its announced change in policy, but now, it is no longer selling off an equal value of U.S. Treasuries each month, which is why its net holdings of U.S. Treasuries are increasing.

The lack of change in the rate at which it is actually acquiring U.S. Treasuries then is the real reason why the Fed's latest QE program has had such little impact upon stock prices. As ZeroHedge observed back on 13 September 2012:

What is scariest, is that as of this moment, all of this is priced in. Any incremental gains in the stock market will have to come from additional easing over and above what Bernanke just announced.

The potential for additional easing is the "wild card" aspect to which we keep referring with respect to the Fed's QE programs in our observations of how changes in the rate of growth of stock prices are behaving with respect to their underlying dividends per share on recent Mondays, which we've specially updated for this Tuesday....

Change in Growth Rates of Future Trailing Year Dividends per Share and S&P 500 Stock Prices, as of 12 March 2013

And that is how jobs, the economy, the Fed's latest quantitative easing program, and U.S. stock prices are all fitting together in context!

Labels: , ,

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Applications

This year, we'll be experimenting with a number of apps to bring more of a current events focus to Political Calculations - we're test driving the app(s) below!

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links
Charities We Support
Recommended Reading
Recommended Viewing
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Archives
Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.