to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Back on 20 April 2009, we bet our entire retirement portfolio on the S&P 500. Last week, on Thursday, 11 June 2009, we followed through on what we were thinking about doing just last Monday and sold it.
You could say we decided we felt, well, lucky....
And that's saying something after the run we had! $100 in our account grew to $114.18 during the 52 days we were fully invested in the S&P 500, which works out to a 153.8% annualized rate of return. Not including the effects of dividend reinvestment, our return would have been 143.6%.
If we had invested one day sooner, on 19 April 2009, our non-dividend reinvested annualized return would have been 79.2%. One day later, on 21 April 2009, we would have realized an annualized rate of return of 110.5%. So we certainly got lucky with our timing back then!
Clearly however, we missed the timing last Thursday. While the S&P 500 closed at 944.89 on that date, just a day later, it closed slightly higher at 946.21. So why did we choose to sell Thursday instead of Friday?
First, we aren't particularly gifted at timing the market. While we've had some success at anticipating where stock prices might go, we don't really have all that good a sense of when exactly they might get there. In fact, our decision to sell on Thursday was determined by two factors:
So we didn't. Next, we'll find out if feeling lucky and being lucky are two different things!
Labels: investing
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.