to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
We'll get to the snarkiness in just a bit, but first, let's salute the U.S.' unemployment situation, which appears to be stabilizing, at least according to the latest news from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Even for teens, as we think we now have enough data to draw that conclusion to confirm our prediction from last September that this would happen by the end of 2009!
Now, let's get to the snarky bits...
The good news about the latest news on unemployment in the U.S.? The last time the total change in the number of people being counted as being employed during the current recession was at the current level, just in November 2009, the unemployment rate was 10.0% instead of 9.7%. Now that's an improvement!
But what did it take to get that improvement? Our next chart combines the percentage change in employment levels by age group against the annualized measure of GDP for each quarter since November 2006, when teen employment levels peaked.
As we can see, it took a 5.7% annualized growth rate for GDP in the fourth quarter of 2009 (according to the advance estimate for this data) to stop the descent. It's probably then a good thing that the U.S. didn't have another quarter of 2.2% GDP growth - if things went like they did in the third quarter of 2009, a lot more jobs would have been lost at that growth rate.
It's almost enough to make us long for the days of 1.5% real GDP growth, back in the second quarter of 2008, the last time the employment situation improved for two consecutive months! In a row! Thank goodness for the stimulus package!
Update: Bill King is also highly suspicious of the January 2010 job numbers....
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.