Political Calculations
March 23, 2011

How does the United States and Canada really compare to each other when it comes to the murderous impulses of each nation's population? And how does it really compare when we take the nations' primary racial and ethnic differences into account?

Let's answer the first question by tapping the data that applies for the year 2006, which in addition to being a pretty typical year for Canadian homicides, is also the most recent year in which Canada conducted a full census of its population. Our first chart reveals what we found when we dug into both Canadian and U.S. homicide statistics for that year:

Homicides for Canada and the United States, 2006

In 2006, Canada saw 606 homicides, while the United States experienced 19,160. Let's next take the relative sizes of each nation's population into account by finding the number of homicides in each country for each 100,000 people.

Homicides per 100,000 People for Canada and the United States, 2006

We find then that Canada saw 1.94 homicides for each 100,000 people in its population, while the United States saw 6.42 homicides for each 100,000 people in its population. These figures represent an apples-to-oranges kind of comparison however, because they do not take the racial and ethnic makeup of each nation into account.

That's important because of the pattern we found in the United States for who kills who. Here, we found that the vast majority of the offenders in homicides are of the same race as their victims. Because the United States has very large minority populations (blacks and Hispanics) which are largely absent in Canada, we must exclude the numbers of homicides of black and Hispanic victims from the U.S. totals to make a much more accurate apples-to-apples kind of comparison of U.S. homicides with Canadian homicides.

The chart below reveals what we found when we compared Canadian homicides with the portions of the U.S. population that most closely resembles the Canadian population:

Homicides per 100,000 People for Canada and Portion of U.S. Population Most Demographically Similar to Canadians, 2006

After comparing just the portions of the U.S. population that is most similar to the makeup of the Canadian population, we find that the U.S. sees approximately one additional homicide per 100,000 people than does Canada, with 2.87 homicides per 100,000 people compared to Canada's 1.94 homicides per 100,000 people.

To put that in perspective, if Canada had the demographically-adjusted U.S. homicide rate of 2.87 per 100,000, it would see an additional 292 homicides per year. Meanwhile, if the portion of the U.S. population that most closely resembles the demographics of the Canadian population had the Canadian homicide rate of 1.94 per 100,000, the United States would see roughly 2,180 fewer homicides per year in this portion of its total population.

Data Sources

Statistics Canada. CANSIM, Table 253-0002 and Homicide Survey, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. 26 October 2010. Accessed 20 March 2011.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control. WISQARS Injury Mortality Reports, 1999-2007. Accessed 20 March 2011.

Labels: , ,



<< Home
Unexpectedly Intriguing!

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

U.S. vs Canada: Comparing Apples to Apples

U.S. vs Canada: Comparing Oranges and Apples

Markets in Everything: Brainy CFLs

The Elephant in the Room

Rising and Fading World Powers

To Whom Does the U.S. Government Really Owe Money?...

Repaving The Sidewalk to Nowhere

Adjusted Forecast for the S&P in March 2011

"Pretty Much"

Visualizing the Characteristics of Minimum Wage Ea...

Most Popular Posts

The S&P 500 at Your Fingertips

The Distribution of Income for 2010: Individuals

Should You Trade in Your Gas Guzzler?

What Are the Chances Your Marriage Will Last?

Tipping Around the World

What's Your Body Fat Percentage?

The Odds of Dying, Again!

Gas Prices, the Unemployment Rate, and Desperation

Hauser's Law

The Real Story Behind "Rising" U.S. Income Inequality

Quick Index

First Time Visitor to Political Calculations?

On the Moneyed Midways

A Lot, But Not All, of Our Tools

U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge

Political Calculations' GDP Temperature Gauge, 2013Q1 First Estimate Political Calculations' U.S. GDP Temperature Gauge provides a means to quickly evaluate the growth rate of the U.S. economy against the backdrop of how the economy has performed since 1980, with the "temperature" color spectrum ranging from a recessionary "cold" (purple) through an expansionary "hot" (red).

The GDP Temperature Gauge presents both the annualized GDP growth rate as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports for a one-quarter period and also as averaged over a two quarter period, which smooths out the volatility seen in the one-quarter data and provides a better indication of the relative strength of the U.S. economy over time.

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

ZunZun - Exceptional regression analysis tool.
Wolfram Integrator - Solve integrals. Do calculus!
Create a Graph - Easy-to-use basic graph-making tool.
Many Eyes - Data visualization extraordinaire!
Wolfram Alpha - Computational knowledge engine.
Khan Academy - Math & science video mini-lectures!
Picasion - Animate images.


Archives
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013

Blog Roll

Bloodhoundblog
Budgets Are Sexy
Cafe Hayek
Carpe Diem
Core77
Coyote Blog
Craig Harper
Darwin's Finance
Digerati Life, The
Division of Labour
Dough Roller, The
Eclectecon
Econlog
Economics Roundtable
EconomicsUK
Environmental Economics
Escape from Cubicle Nation
Execupundit
FiscalGeek
Get Rich Slowly
Gongol
Good Financial Cents
HR Bartender
Hot Air
i4cp Productivity
Innocent Bystanders
Innovation and Growth
Instapundit
Intangible Economy
I've Paid Twice for This Already
Joanne Jacobs
Kaus Files
Len Penzo dot Com
Making Ripples
Market Power
Mechonomics
Mighty Bargain Hunter
Monevator
My Dollar Plan
New Economist
Newmark's Door
Nina Simosko
Physorg
Private Sector Development
Real Clear Politics
Richard Fernandez
Roger L. Simon
Rowan Manahan
Sound Politics
SOX First
Sports Economist, The
squawkfox
Three Star Leadership
Tim Worstall
Townhall
Trusted Advisor
Uncommon Misperceptions
voluntaryXchange
WILLisms
Winterspeak

Market Links

Big Picture, The
Crackerjack Finance
CXO Advisory Group
Disciplined Approach to Investing
Dividend Guy, The
Doug Short
Evidence Investing
Fat Pitch Financials
FX Investment Strategies
Oilprice

Charities We Support

American Red Cross
Children's Heart Foundation
Salvation Army
SMA Foundation

Recommended Reading

Kindle Paperwhite 3G - Best e-reader!
Angel in the Whirlwind
Bailout Nation
Cartoon Guide to Statistics
A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War
The Complete Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant
The Count of Monte Cristo
Ender's Game
Gardner's Art Through the Ages
Empire of Wealth
How to Make Presentations to Councils and Boards
Juran's Quality Handbook
Marks' Standard Handbook
The Second World War
Stocks for the Long Run
Why Smart Executives Fail

Recommended Viewing

The Tudors: The Complete Series

Recently Shopped

Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G LTE Wireless 32 GB
Snap Circuits Jr. SC-100
Nerf Vortex Praxis
Sony BRAVIA 40" LED HDTV
2540 Series Docking Station
New Balance MX623
Dunham Men's Waterproof Oxford
TN360 Black Toner Cartridge
The Dangerous Book for Boys
Air Swimmer Remote Control Inflatable Flying Shark
Fisher-Price Little People Lil Pirate Ship

Seeking Alpha Certified