to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
If you were to drag a $100 bill through Harvard Yard, there's no telling what fool thing you can get a Harvard professor to sign onto, even if it hurts themselves. Drag enough of them through Harvard Yard and you can probably even get a former president of the university to demand that all $100 bills be eliminated from existence.
Others have gone far beyond that proposal, demanding that physical currency be eliminated altogether, and even taking action to realize their dream of a cashless society.
We have one argument against these proposals to eliminate physical currency as a legitimate form of payments in everyday transactions.
Because of the glare on the glass in the image, here's the text of the photo that was snapped within the past few weeks:
Credit and Debit is currently down at the moment. We can only accept cash payments at this time.
Thanks,
Circle K Staff
Inside, we witnessed customers who missed the sign posted on the outside door be turned away, their purchases of chilled containers of carbonated beverages defeated by a credit and debit transaction processing system that just wasn't connecting to the network. Which frankly, is something that many of us will directly observe several times a year without taking much notice, on account of our seeing it happen often enough that it's not some rare phenomenon.
And so, with a single sheet of paper taped to a glass door, the staff at just one Circle K has demonstrated a critical failure of any plan to eliminate physical currency from the economy.
With physical currency, it is possible to continue engaging in trade and commerce during any of the following scenarios that would quickly and easily bring electronic commerce through credit and debit charges to a halt:
Eliminating physical currency then would increase the vulnerability of a nation's economy to damage from such calamities because it removes a key redundancy by which which economic activity may otherwise continue in the face of such obstacles. A nation that adopted such a policy would effectively be harming its own national security.
Now, here's the fun part. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Harvard President Larry Summers cited the popularity of large denomination bills among regular criminals in his argument for why he believes the $100 bill should be removed from circulation.
But the whole Panama Papers scandal that just erupted onto the world stage reveals that almost all of the money involved in the shady dealings that took place over years wasn't in the form of $100 bills. Instead, the billions that were being unlawfully funneled into the shell accounts of the crooked and corrupt were moved almost entirely electronically through established financial institutions. Apparently, the really big criminals are really big into the modern convenience of electronic commerce!
That's why we're going to suggest a smarter alternative - one that even a former Harvard President should consider signing onto, because not many criminals would consider dragging anything so valuable through Harvard Yard.
Then again, this is Harvard we're talking about. For regular people, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to keep some cash around that could be considered to be part of one's disaster preparedness kit.
Labels: business, crime, currency exchange, economics, trade
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.