to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
Just days ago, Barry Ritholtz featured the following image primarily displaying the day-to-day volatility in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) from January 2, 1900 through December 31, 2007, taken from a graphic essay in the New York Times:
The chart reveals the day-to-day percentage swings in the DJIA index and ties significant movement in the market to historic events, but the main thing we believe the chart illustrates is how difficult it is to decipher significant patterns within the stock market. Worse, looking at the day-to-day price swings doesn't do much in helping to diagnose whether the market, and to a larger extent, the U.S. economy, is truly healthy or not.
Separating the signal from the noise doesn't get much easier when you look at the average percentage changes in the market over time. The following chart shows our data for the S&P 500 from January 1871 through December 2007 and illustrates the year-over-year changes in the rate at which the average monthly price per share of the index changed over that time:
The chart shows wide swings, generally corresponding with the cycles of boom and bust in the overall stock market, but nothing that really says "This is a boom, and that is a bubble!" or "That's just a correction, that's a crash, and that over there is a full-up recession!"
Since it leads to where we're going next, our next chart shows the year-over-year changes in the rate at which the average monthly cash dividend per share for the S&P 500 changed from January 1871 through December 2007:
The data in this chart is really only slightly better. Here, we can get a sense that the dividend growth rate was in positive territory were probably good for the market, while the times this rate was negative were probably bad, but not always. There are, for instance, several recessions that coincide with periods where the dividend growth rate was in positive territory, but you wouldn't necessarily know that from studying this chart!
We've remarked before that the strong correlation between the value of the S&P 500 index and its dividends per share make the Price-Dividend Growth Ratio that we recently defined especially useful as a means for benchmarking the performance of the stock market. This brings us to our next chart, which shows the value of the Price-Dividend Growth Ratio from January 1871 through December 2007, as determined using the trailing year Price per Share and Dividends per Share growth rates:
Suddenly, the stock market looks very, very different. We find that the market consists of periods of relative calm, in which the Price-Dividend Growth Ratio might be described as having at least a stable distribution, punctuated by periods of disequilibrium. We also find that the market is generally a lot less volatile than it used to be.
More importantly however, the chart above looks a bit like an EKG. And like an electrocardiogram, we can use it to diagnose the condition of the stock market, and by extension, revealing the beating heart of the stock market.
In fact, let's do just that. Our next chart presents the same data as before, but this time incorporates the dates corresponding with recessions as determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research:
Note: The chart above presents the same Price-Dividend Growth Ratio data we showed in our previous chart, but shifted to coincide with the beginning of the one-year period covered by the underlying price-per-share and dividends-per-share growth rate data. For clarity, the first point on the chart, shown as beginning in 1871, corresponds with the period from January 1871 to January 1872, while the last point on the chart corresponds with the one-year period from December 2006 to December 2007.
We find that recessions do coincide with many of the largest "spikes" in the Price-Dividend Growth Ratio. We also note the presence of other spikes that do not coincide with recession dates determined by NBER, but note that these generally represent short term disruptive events that failed to satisfy the traditional two-quarter duration threshold for a recession to be declared.
And so, with just a glance, we can confirm that the Price-Dividend Growth Ratio may be used to determine the magnitude of relative disequilibrium in the S&P 500, and therefore, might be successfully used as a near real-time indicator of the overall health of the stock market, and by extension, the U.S. economy.
While we have opened a mine of opportunity to explore, a close examination of the S&P 500's Price-Dividend Growth Ratio through December 2007 does not suggest the building of a recessionary spike through this time. The key thing to measure however will be any changes that the dividend-paying companies of the S&P 500 make during the course of the year that would significantly reduce the rate of dividend growth, since this is the driving factor that produces the "spike" effect which indicates real distress in the stock market.
Labels: dividends, recession forecast, SP 500, stock market
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.