Unexpectedly Intriguing!
December 5, 2008

Today's Employment Situation report for November 2008 revealed that some 533,000 individuals are no longer counted as being employed on a non-farm payroll in the U.S. as compared to a month ago, after adjusting for seasonal factors. But what happens when you look at the total employment numbers?

The same BLS report shows that between October and November 2008, some 676,000 individuals are no longer counted as being employed. Of these, 215,000 (or 31.8% of the monthly decline) are between the ages of 16 and 19 years old. Those Age 16-19 account for just 3.61% of the entire U.S. working population as of November 2008, down from 3.74% a month earlier, and down from the high of 4.34% set in May 2006.

Between October and November 2008, 75,000 young adults between the ages of 20 and 24 years old are no longer counted as being employed, which represents 11.1% of the monthly decline of 676,000. These individuals represent 9.3% of the entire U.S. workforce, which is unchanged from the previous month.

Meanwhile, those Age 25+ account for 386,000 (57.1%) of the monthly decline. These individuals represent over 87% of the U.S. workforce.

Change in Number of Employed by Age Group Since Total Employment Peak Reached in November 2007 Let's next put those monthly figures into a larger context. While the NBER has identified December 2007 as the month in which a recession began in the United States, coinciding with the peak of non-farm payroll employment, we'll instead show the change in total employment since November 2007, the month that this figure peaked. This way, we can capture whatever contribution the economy of December 2007 itself might have had upon the overall employment trend toward recession.

We see that since total employment peaked in the U.S. in November 2007 at 146,647,000, some 620,000 individuals Age 16-19, 502,000 individuals Age 20-24 and 1,243,000 individuals Age 25 or older are no longer counted as being employed. Of the total decline of 2,365,000 in the total number of employed individuals, as of November 2008, 26.2% are Age 16-19, 21.2% are Age 20-24 and the remaining 52.4% are Age 25 and older.

The high percentages for the Age 16-19 (26.2%) and Age 20-24 (21.2%) groups are especially interesting, in that these figures are pretty close to these age group's respective representation among all workers earning the federal minimum wage in the U.S.

Percentage of Number Employed for Age 16-19 and Age 20+ from Levels Recorded in May 2006 All this puts the current number of employed individuals roughly at where it was in May 2006, when teen employment peaked at 6,249,000 (the level as of November 2008 is 5,212,000.) The following chart shows how employment levels for the Age 16-19 and Age 20+ groups have changed from May 2006 through November 2008 as a percentage of the employment levels recorded in May 2006, which we present against the backdrop of GDP levels and minimum wage milestones recorded during the period.

Finally, we recall our words from 7 April 2008, in which we tweaked Larry Kudlow for his recognition that a recession was brewing (emphasis ours):

Since the minimum wage across the United States has been increasing, with a number of state's increasing their minimum wages effective in January 2008, and is scheduled to increase at the federal level in July 2008, we can expect the U.S. unemployment rate to peak for the year in November or December, given the roughly six month lag between when a minimum wage increase takes effect to when jobs or hours are cut back.

Most jobs so affected will be entry level positions at the small business level. Nationally, these individuals of ages 15 through 24 will account for the vast majority of the ranks of the unemployed.

Unfortunately, one of the major political parties in the United States is firmly opposed to doing anything that might lower the rate of unemployment this year, especially for young people. At least, until after the election. Maybe.

We'd make one change in that statement, since we've since demonstrated that employers don't wait six months after minimum wage increases occur before taking steps to reduce the impact of these mandated cost increases imposed by government upon their businesses. Instead, they begin reacting as soon as they know the likelihood that the increases will occur. We still have to see if the last part of that particular prediction is on track.

Elsewhere, King Banaian compares the non-farm payroll employment declines of the current recession against other recessions since 1980 and Mark Perry compares how men and women are faring in the job market of the current recession.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations



blog advertising
is good for you

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations.com

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Applications

This year, we'll be experimenting with a number of apps to bring more of a current events focus to Political Calculations - we're test driving the app(s) below!

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Visitors since December 6, 2004:

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links
Charities We Support
Recommended Reading
Recommended Viewing
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Archives
Legal Disclaimer

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.