to your HTML Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable Click on the headers to sort Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions. Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html This basically means: do what you want with it. */ var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false; sorttable = { init: function() { // quit if this function has already been called if (arguments.callee.done) return; // flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice arguments.callee.done = true; // kill the timer if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer); if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return; sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/; forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) { if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) { sorttable.makeSortable(table); } }); }, makeSortable: function(table) { if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) { // table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and // put the first table row in it. the = document.createElement('thead'); the.appendChild(table.rows[0]); table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild); } // Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0]; if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows // Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as // "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed // to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows, // for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed). sortbottomrows = []; for (var i=0; i
The U.S.-China 'Phase 1' trade deal signed by U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese Premier Xi Jinping on 15 January 2020 is a failure.
That is the assessment of analysts and Biden administration trade officials, who point to the failure of Chinese officials to live up to their part of the agreement. The deal had required China to boost its purchases of U.S.-produced goods and services by $200 billion over two years. The following excerpt describes how far China fell short according to their analysis:
An analysis of final 2021 Census trade data compiled by economist Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics showed China met just 57% of its full two-year goods and services targets.
Beijing’s purchases of the goods, energy and services targeted in the Phase 1 agreement were not even enough to return to China’s baseline 2017 level of purchases of U.S. imports after retaliatory tariffs had eroded them in 2018 and 2019, he said.
"Put differently, China bought none of the additional $200 billion of exports Trump’s deal had promised," Bown said in his analysis here....
Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Sarah Bianchi said last week it was "really clear that the Chinese haven't met their commitment in Phase 1" and the Biden administration was working with Chinese officials here to address the matter.
Political Calculations has tracked the outcome of the 'Phase 1' trade deal between the U.S. and China from the beginning, so we have some insight into the shortfall. As part of that analysis, we created a counterfactual, or rather, a projection of how trade between the U.S. and China would be expected to grow after the deal was struck.
But that projection ignored any contribution that might come from the additional $200 billion worth of U.S.-produced goods and services that Chinese officials committed to buy over the next two years.
Had everything gone as negotiated, that counterfactual projection would have provided an easy way to measure how much more growth in the value of goods and services traded between the two nations had occurred as a result of the agreement. But in reality, the onset of the coronavirus pandemic in China meant it became our primary means to directly measure the impact of the pandemic on trade between the U.S. and China. Here's the final update to our chart in which we've tracked that evolution.
Collectively, we find the cumulative net loss of trade attributable to the coronavirus pandemic from January 2020 through December 2021 is $176 billion, which is visualized as the gap between the heavy black line and the dashed red line representing what instead became a "no coronavirus pandemic" counterfactual.
If China had met its 'Phase 1' trade deal obligations to purchase an additional $200 billion more U.S.-produced manufacturing, agricultural, and energy goods and services beyond the deal's baseline, we would instead have seen the heavy black line rise above the dashed red line before December 2021. That it generally parallels it while remaining consistently well below it confirms Bown's assessment. December 2021 marked the last month of China's obligation to make its 'Phase 1' trade deal purchases of additional U.S.-produced goods and services, so that door has now closed.
While the preceding analysis confirms China failed to meet its obligation, that failure is jointly shared with the Trump and Biden administrations, who could have done more to press for the success of the deal. That's especially true of the Biden administration, which both bought into the former president's trade strategy and benefited from strongly recovering economies in both China and the U.S. during its first year in office, but whose actions to press the Chinese to comply with their obligations under the deal have proven ineffectual.
Lawder, David. U.S. December trade data reveals massive shortfall in China's 'Phase 1' purchases. Reuters. 8 February 2022.
Lawder, David and Shalai, Andrea. U.S. trade official says China failed to meet 'Phase 1' commitments. Reuters. 1 February 2022.
U.S. Census Bureau. Trade in Goods with China. Last updated: 8 February 2022. Accessed 8 February 2022.
Here is all the analysis we've presented in chronological order, starting from Month 0, when the 'Phase 1' trade deal between the U.S. and China was struck, all the way through December 2021, which marks the end of our coverage.
Labels: trade
Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:
ironman at politicalcalculations
Thanks in advance!
Closing values for previous trading day.
This site is primarily powered by:
The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.